Maximum likelihood (ML) decoding of linear block codes can be considered as an integer linear programming (ILP). Since it is an NP-hard problem in general, there are many researches about the algorithms to approximately solve the problem. One of the most popular algorithms is linear programming (LP) decoding proposed by Feldman et al. LP decoding is based on the LP relaxation, which is a method to approximately solve the ILP corresponding to the ML decoding problem. Advanced algorithms for solving ILP (approximately or exactly) include cutting-plane method and branch-and-bound method. As applications of these methods, adaptive LP decoding and branch-and-bound decoding have been proposed by Taghavi et al. and Yang et al., respectively. Another method for solving ILP is the branch-and-cut method, which is a hybrid of cutting-plane and branch-and-bound methods. The branch-and-cut method is widely used to solve ILP, however, it is unobvious that the method works well for the ML decoding problem. In this paper, we show that the branch-and-cut method is certainly effective for the ML decoding problem. Furthermore the branch-and-cut method consists of some technical components and the performance of the algorithm depends on the selection of these components. It is important to consider how to select the technical components in the branch-and-cut method. We see the differences caused by the selection of those technical components and consider which scheme is most effective for the ML decoding problem through numerical simulations.
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Copy
Shunsuke HORII, Toshiyasu MATSUSHIMA, Shigeichi HIRASAWA, "A Note on the Branch-and-Cut Approach to Decoding Linear Block Codes" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals,
vol. E93-A, no. 11, pp. 1912-1917, November 2010, doi: 10.1587/transfun.E93.A.1912.
Abstract: Maximum likelihood (ML) decoding of linear block codes can be considered as an integer linear programming (ILP). Since it is an NP-hard problem in general, there are many researches about the algorithms to approximately solve the problem. One of the most popular algorithms is linear programming (LP) decoding proposed by Feldman et al. LP decoding is based on the LP relaxation, which is a method to approximately solve the ILP corresponding to the ML decoding problem. Advanced algorithms for solving ILP (approximately or exactly) include cutting-plane method and branch-and-bound method. As applications of these methods, adaptive LP decoding and branch-and-bound decoding have been proposed by Taghavi et al. and Yang et al., respectively. Another method for solving ILP is the branch-and-cut method, which is a hybrid of cutting-plane and branch-and-bound methods. The branch-and-cut method is widely used to solve ILP, however, it is unobvious that the method works well for the ML decoding problem. In this paper, we show that the branch-and-cut method is certainly effective for the ML decoding problem. Furthermore the branch-and-cut method consists of some technical components and the performance of the algorithm depends on the selection of these components. It is important to consider how to select the technical components in the branch-and-cut method. We see the differences caused by the selection of those technical components and consider which scheme is most effective for the ML decoding problem through numerical simulations.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/fundamentals/10.1587/transfun.E93.A.1912/_p
Copy
@ARTICLE{e93-a_11_1912,
author={Shunsuke HORII, Toshiyasu MATSUSHIMA, Shigeichi HIRASAWA, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals},
title={A Note on the Branch-and-Cut Approach to Decoding Linear Block Codes},
year={2010},
volume={E93-A},
number={11},
pages={1912-1917},
abstract={Maximum likelihood (ML) decoding of linear block codes can be considered as an integer linear programming (ILP). Since it is an NP-hard problem in general, there are many researches about the algorithms to approximately solve the problem. One of the most popular algorithms is linear programming (LP) decoding proposed by Feldman et al. LP decoding is based on the LP relaxation, which is a method to approximately solve the ILP corresponding to the ML decoding problem. Advanced algorithms for solving ILP (approximately or exactly) include cutting-plane method and branch-and-bound method. As applications of these methods, adaptive LP decoding and branch-and-bound decoding have been proposed by Taghavi et al. and Yang et al., respectively. Another method for solving ILP is the branch-and-cut method, which is a hybrid of cutting-plane and branch-and-bound methods. The branch-and-cut method is widely used to solve ILP, however, it is unobvious that the method works well for the ML decoding problem. In this paper, we show that the branch-and-cut method is certainly effective for the ML decoding problem. Furthermore the branch-and-cut method consists of some technical components and the performance of the algorithm depends on the selection of these components. It is important to consider how to select the technical components in the branch-and-cut method. We see the differences caused by the selection of those technical components and consider which scheme is most effective for the ML decoding problem through numerical simulations.},
keywords={},
doi={10.1587/transfun.E93.A.1912},
ISSN={1745-1337},
month={November},}
Copy
TY - JOUR
TI - A Note on the Branch-and-Cut Approach to Decoding Linear Block Codes
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals
SP - 1912
EP - 1917
AU - Shunsuke HORII
AU - Toshiyasu MATSUSHIMA
AU - Shigeichi HIRASAWA
PY - 2010
DO - 10.1587/transfun.E93.A.1912
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals
SN - 1745-1337
VL - E93-A
IS - 11
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals
Y1 - November 2010
AB - Maximum likelihood (ML) decoding of linear block codes can be considered as an integer linear programming (ILP). Since it is an NP-hard problem in general, there are many researches about the algorithms to approximately solve the problem. One of the most popular algorithms is linear programming (LP) decoding proposed by Feldman et al. LP decoding is based on the LP relaxation, which is a method to approximately solve the ILP corresponding to the ML decoding problem. Advanced algorithms for solving ILP (approximately or exactly) include cutting-plane method and branch-and-bound method. As applications of these methods, adaptive LP decoding and branch-and-bound decoding have been proposed by Taghavi et al. and Yang et al., respectively. Another method for solving ILP is the branch-and-cut method, which is a hybrid of cutting-plane and branch-and-bound methods. The branch-and-cut method is widely used to solve ILP, however, it is unobvious that the method works well for the ML decoding problem. In this paper, we show that the branch-and-cut method is certainly effective for the ML decoding problem. Furthermore the branch-and-cut method consists of some technical components and the performance of the algorithm depends on the selection of these components. It is important to consider how to select the technical components in the branch-and-cut method. We see the differences caused by the selection of those technical components and consider which scheme is most effective for the ML decoding problem through numerical simulations.
ER -