In our former paper, we formalized a Logic of Multiple-valued Argumentation (LMA) on an expressive knowledge representation language, Extended Annotated Logic Programming (EALP), in order to make it possible to construct arguments under uncertain information. In this paper, We confirm expressivity and applicability by applying LMA to arguments reflecting Easterners' preference over argumentation as well as Eastern thought and philosophy. In doing so, we exploit a wide variety of complete lattices as truth-values, showing the flexibility and adaptability of LMA to various multiple-valuedness required in argumentation under uncertain information. In particular, we consider a significant specialization of LMA to Tetralemma with an Eastern mind. Through various argument examples, it is shown that LMA allows for a kind of pluralistic argumentation, or a fusion of Eastern and Western argumentation.