A deterministic pushdown automaton (dpda) having just one stack symbol is called a deterministic restricted one-counter automaton (droca). When it accepts by empty stack, it is called strict. A deterministic one-counter automaton (doca) is a dpda having only one stack symbol, with the exception of a bottom-of-stack marker. The class of languages accepted by strict droca's is a subclass of the class of languages accepted by doca's. Valiant has proved the decidability of the equivalence problem for doca's and the undecidability of the inclusion problem for doca's. Hence the decidablity of the equivalence problem for strict droca's is obvious. In this paper, we present a new direct branching algorithm for checking the inclusion for a pair of languages accepted by strict droca's. Then we show that the worst-case time complexity of our algorithm is polynomial with respect to these automata.

A deterministic pushdown automaton (dpda) having just one stack symbol is called a deterministic restricted one-counter automaton (droca). A deterministic one-counter automaton (doca) is a dpda having only one stack symbol, with the exception of a bottom-of-stack marker. The class of languages accepted by droca's which accept by final state is a proper subclass of the class of languages accepted by doca's. Valiant has proved the decidability of the equivalence problem for doca's and the undecidability of the inclusion problem for doca's. Hence the decidability of the equivalence problem for droca's is obvious. In this paper, we evaluate the upper bound of the length of the shortest input string (witness) that disproves the inclusion for a pair of real-time droca's which accept by final state, and present a new direct branching algorithm for checking the inclusion for a pair of languages accepted by these droca's. Then we show that the worst-case time complexity of our algorithm is polynomial in the size of these droca's.

A deterministic pushdown automaton (dpda) having just one stack symbol is called a deterministic restricted one-counter automaton (droca). A deterministic one-counter automaton (doca) is a dpda having only one stack symbol, with the exception of a bottom-of-stack marker. The class of languages accepted by droca's which accept by final state is a proper subclass of the class of languages accepted by doca's. Valiant has proved the decidability of the equivalence problem for doca's and the undecidability of the inclusion problem for doca's. Thus the decidability of the equivalence problem for droca's is obvious. In this paper, we evaluate the upper bound of the length of the shortest input string (shortest witness) that disproves the inclusion for a pair of real-time droca's which accept by accept mode, and present a direct branching algorithm for checking the inclusion for a pair of languages accepted by these droca's. Then we show that the worst-case time complexity of our algorithm is polynomial in the size of these droca's.

A deterministic pushdown automaton (dpda) having just one stack symbol is called a deterministic restricted one-counter automaton (droca). A deterministic one-counter automaton (doca) is a dpda having only one stack symbol, with the exception of a bottom-of-stack market. The class of languages accepted by droca's is a proper subclass of the class of languages accepted by doca's. Valiant has shown that the regularity problem for doca's is decidable in a single exponential worst-case time complexity. In this paper, we prove that the class of languages accepted by droca's which accept by final state is incomparable with the class of languages accepted by droca's which accept by empty stack (strict droca's), and that the intersection of them is equal to the class of strict regular languages. In addition, we present a new direct branching algorithm for checking the regularity for not only a strict droca but also a real-time droca which accepts by final state. Then we show that the worst-case time complexity of our algorithm is polynomial in the size of each droca.

In this paper, we present a new encoding/decoding method for dynamic multidimensional datasets and its implementation scheme. Our method encodes an n-dimensional tuple into a pair of scalar values even if n is sufficiently large. The method also encodes and decodes tuples using only shift and and/or register instructions. One of the most serious problems in multidimensional array based tuple encoding is that the size of an encoded result may often exceed the machine word size for large-scale tuple sets. This problem is efficiently resolved in our scheme. We confirmed the advantages of our scheme by analytical and experimental evaluations. The experimental evaluations were conducted to compare our constructed prototype system with other systems; (1) a system based on a similar encoding scheme called history-offset encoding, and (2) PostgreSQL RDBMS. In most cases, both the storage and retrieval costs of our system significantly outperformed those of the other systems.