In the 3-slope ski-rental problem, the player is asked to determine a strategy, that is, (i) whether to buy a ski wear and then a ski set separately, or to buy them at once for a discount price, and (ii) when to buy these goods. If the player has not got any thing, he/she can rent it for some price. The objective is to minimize the total cost, under the assumption that the player does not know how many times he/she goes skiing in the future. We reveal that even with a large discount for buying at once available, there is some price setting for which to buy the goods separately is a more reasonable choice. We also show that the performance of the optimal strategy may become arbitrarily worse, when a large discount is offered.

We consider the polymatroid packing and covering problems. The polynomial time algorithm with the best approximation bound known for either problem is the greedy algorithm, yielding guaranteed approximation factors of 1/k for polymatroid packing and H(k) for polymatroid covering, where k is the largest rank of an element in a polymatroid, and H(k)=Σi=1k 1/i is the kth Harmonic number. The main contribution of this note is to improve these bounds by slightly extending the greedy heuristics. Specifically, it will be shown how to obtain approximation factors of 2/(k+1) for packing and H(k)-1/6 for covering, generalizing some existing results on k-set packing, matroid matching, and k-set cover problems.

We consider a problem as follows: Given unit weights arriving in an online manner with the total cardinality unknown, upon each arrival we decide where to place it on the unit circle in $mathbb{R}^{2}$. The objective is to set the center of mass of the placed weights as close to the origin as possible. We apply competitive analysis defining the competitive difference as a performance measure. We first present an optimal strategy for placing unit weights which achieves a competitive difference of $rac{1}{5}$. We next consider a variant in which the destination of each weight must be chosen from a set of positions that equally divide the unit circle. We give a simple strategy whose competitive difference is 0.35. Moreover, in the offline setting, several conditions for the center of mass to lie at the origin are derived.

We consider a problem of the choice of price plans offered by a telecommunications company: a “pay-as-you-go” plan and a “flat-rate” plan. This problem is formulated as an online optimization problem extending the ski-rental problem, and analyzed using the competitive ratio. We give a lemma for easily calculating the competitive ratio. Based on the lemma, we derive a family of optimal strategies for a realistic class of instances.

Suppose one of the edges is attacked in a graph G, where some number of guards are placed on some of its vertices. If a guard is placed on one of the end-vertices of the attacked edge, she can defend such an attack to protect G by passing over the edge. For each of such attacks, every guard is allowed either to move to a neighboring vertex, or to stay at where she is. The eternal vertex cover number τ∞(G) is the minimum number of guards sufficient to protect G from any length of any sequence of edge attacks. This paper derives the eternal vertex cover number τ∞(G) of such graphs constructed by replacing each edge of a tree by an arbitrary elementary bipartite graph (or by an arbitrary clique), in terms of easily computable graph invariants only, thereby showing that τ∞(G) can be computed in polynomial time for such graphs G.

A binary tree is regarded as a prefix-free binary code, in which the weighted sum of the lengths of root-leaf paths is equal to the expected codeword length. Huffman's algorithm computes an optimal tree in O(n log n) time, where n is the number of leaves. The problem was later generalized by allowing each leaf to have its own function of its depth and setting the sum of the function values as the objective function. The generalized problem was proved to be NP-hard. In this paper we study the case where every function is a unit step function, that is, a function that takes a lower constant value if the depth does not exceed a threshold, and a higher constant value otherwise. We show that for this case, the problem can be solved in O(n log n) time, by reducing it to the Coin Collector's problem.

The main problem considered is submodular set cover, the problem of minimizing a linear function under a nondecreasing submodular constraint, which generalizes both well-known set cover and minimum matroid base problems. The problem is NP-hard, and two natural greedy heuristics are introduced along with analysis of their performance. As applications of these heuristics we consider various special cases of submodular set cover, including partial cover variants of set cover and vertex cover, and node-deletion problems for hereditary and matroidal properties. An approximation bound derived for each of them is either matching or generalizing the best existing bounds.

The legal firing sequence problem (LFS) asks if it is possible to fire each transition some prescribed number of times in a given Petri net. It is a fundamental problem in Petri net theory as it appears as a subproblem, or as a simplified version of marking reachability, minimum initial resource allocation, liveness, and some scheduling problems. It is also known to be NP-hard, however, even under various restrictions on nets (and on firing counts), and no efficient algorithm has been previously reported for any class of nets having general edge weights. We show in this paper that LFS can be solved in polynomial time (in O(n log n) time) for a subclass of state machines, called cacti, with arbitrary edge weights allowed (if each transition is asked to be fired exactly once).

The multislope ski-rental problem is an extension of the classical ski-rental problem, where the player has several options of paying both of a per-time fee and an initial fee, in addition to pure renting and buying options. Damaschke gave a lower bound of 3.62 on the competitive ratio for the case where arbitrary number of options can be offered. In this paper we propose a scheme that for the number of options given as an input, provides a lower bound on the competitive ratio, by extending the method of Damaschke. This is the first to establish a lower bound for each of the 5-or-more-option cases, for example, a lower bound of 2.95 for the 5-option case, 3.08 for the 6-option case, and 3.18 for the 7-option case. Moreover, it turns out that our lower bounds for the 3- and 4-option cases respectively coincide with the known upper bounds. We therefore conjecture that our scheme in general derives a matching lower and upper bound.