This paper studies packet scheduling schemes with QoE (user-level QoS) guarantee for audio-video transmission in a wireless LAN with HCF controlled channel access (HCCA) of the IEEE 802.11e MAC protocol. We first propose the static scheduling (SS) scheme, which grants adjustable transmission opportunity (TXOP) duration for constant bit rate (CBR) traffic. The SS scheme can determine the minimum TXOP duration capable of guaranteeing high QoE; it can maximize the number of admitted flows. As the burstiness of variable bit rate (VBR) traffic cannot be absorbed by the SS scheme, we also propose the multimedia priority dynamic scheduling (MPDS) scheme, which can absorb the burstiness through allocating additional TXOP duration. We then compare the SS scheme, the MPDS scheme, and the reference scheduler (TGe scheme) in terms of application-level QoS and user-level QoS (QoE). Numerical results show that in the SS scheme, the QoE can be kept relatively higher even when the TXOP duration is reduced in the case of video with the I picture pattern; this implies that more flows can be admitted. In the case of video with the IPPPPP picture pattern, which has the VBR characteristic more remarkably, reducing the TXOP duration according to the SS scheme will deteriorate the QoS level. In this case, the MPDS scheme performs better when the number of multimedia stations is small. However, the performance of the MPDS scheme deteriorates with the increase of the number of multimedia stations, though the results are comparable to or even better than those of the SS and TGe schemes.

This paper proposes a cross-layer packet scheduling scheme for QoS support in audio-video transmission with IEEE 802.11e HCCA and assesses application-level QoS and QoE of the scheduling scheme under lossy channel conditions. In the proposed scheme, the access point (AP) basically allocates transmission opportunity (TXOP) for each station in a service interval (SI) like the reference scheduler of the IEEE 802.11e standard, which is referred to as the TGe scheme in this paper. In the proposed scheme, however, the AP calculates the number of MAC service data units (MSDUs) arrived in an SI, considering the inter-arrival time of audio samples and that of video frames, which are referred to as media units (MUs), at the application layer. The AP then gives additional TXOP duration in the SI to stations which had audio or video MAC protocol data units (MPDUs) in their source buffers at the end of the previous TXOP. In addition, utilizing video frame information from the application layer, we propose video frame skipping at the MAC-level of a source station. If a station fails to transmit a video MPDU, it drops all the following video MPDUs in the source buffer until the next intra-coded frame comes to the head of the buffer. We compare the reference scheduler (TGe scheme), the proposed packet scheduling scheme with and without the video frame skipping at the source in terms of application-level QoS and QoE. We discuss the effectiveness of the proposed packet scheduling scheme from a viewpoint of QoE as well as QoS. Numerical results reveal that the proposed packet scheduling scheme can achieve higher quality than the TGe scheme under lossy channel conditions. We also show that the proposed scheduling scheme can improve the QoS and QoE by using the video frame skipping at the source. Furthermore, we also examine the effect of SI on the QoS and QoE of the proposed packet scheduling scheme and obtain that the appropriate value of SI is equal to the inter-arrival time of video frame.