Linear cryptanalysis proposed by Matsui is one of the most effective attacks on block ciphers. Some attempts to improve linear cryptanalysis have been made since Matsui introduced. We focus on how to optimize linear cryptanalysis with such techniques, and we apply the optimized linear cryptanalysis on FEAL-8X. First, we evaluate two existing implementation methods so as to optimize the computation time of linear cryptanalysis. Method 1 removes redundant round function computations and optimizes the other computation of linear cryptanalysis by transforming it into bitwise operations. Method 2 transforms the computation of linear cryptanalysis into a matrix multiplication and reduces the time complexity of the multiplication using the fast Fourier transform (FFT). We implement both methods optimized for modern microprocessors and compare their computation time to clarify the appropriate method for practical cryptanalysis. From the result, we show that the superior implementation depends on the number of given known plaintexts (KPs) and that of guessed key bits. Furthermore, we show that these results enable us to select the superior method to implement linear cryptanalysis without another comparative experiment. By using the superior method, we implement the multiple linear cryptanalysis (MLC) on FEAL-8X. Our implementation can recover the secret key of FEAL-8X with 210KPs in practical computation time with non-negligible probability, and it is the best attack on FEAL-8X in data complexity.

An integral attack is one of the most powerful attacks against block ciphers. We propose a new technique for the integral attack called the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) key recovery. When N chosen plaintexts are required for the integral characteristic and the guessed key is k bits, a straightforward key recovery requires the time complexity of O(N2k). However, the FFT key recovery only requires the time complexity of O(N+k2k). As a previous result using FFT, at ICISC 2007, Collard etal proposed that FFT can reduce the time complexity of a linear attack. We show that FFT can also reduce the complexity of the integral attack. Moreover, the estimation of the complexity is very simple. We first show the complexity of the FFT key recovery against three structures, the Even-Mansour scheme, a key-alternating cipher, and the Feistel structure. As examples of these structures, we show integral attacks against Prøst, AES, PRESENT, and CLEFIA. As a result, an 8-round Prøst P128,K can be attacked with about an approximate time complexity of 279.6. For the key-alternating cipher, a 6-round AES and a 10-round PRESENT can be attacked with approximate time complexities of 251.7 and 297.4, respectively. For the Feistel structure, a 12-round CLEFIA can be attacked with approximate time complexities of 287.5.