The cost of checkpointing consists of checkpoint overhead and checkpoint latency. The former is the time to stop the process for checkpointing. The latter is the time to complete the checkpointing including background checkpointing which stores memory pages. The large checkpoint latency increases the possibility that the error occurs in background checkpointing, which leads to long rollback distance. The method for small checkpoint latency has not been proposed yet. This paper proposes a checkpointing method which achieves small checkpoint latency. The proposed method divides a checkpoint interval into several subcheckpoint intervals. By using the history of memory page modification in subcheckpoint intervals, the proposed method saves some pages which are not expected to be modified in the rest of checkpoint interval in advance. Computer simulation says that the proposed method can reduce the checkpoint latency by 25% comparing to the existing methods.

Forked checkpointing scheme is proposed to achieve low checkpoint overhead. When a process wants to take a checkpoint in the forked checkpointing scheme, it creates a child process and continues its normal computation. Two recovery models can be used for forked checkpointing when the parent process fails before the child process establishes the checkpoint. One is the pessimistic recovery model where the recovery process rolls back to the previous checkpoint state. The other is the optimistic recovery model where a recovery process waits for the checkpoint to be established by the child process. In this paper, we present the recovery models for forked checkpointing by deriving the expected execution time of a process with and without checkpointing and also show that the expected recovery time of the optimistic recovery model is smaller than that of the pessimistic recovery model.