The exposure of children to mobile phones has been a concern for years, but so far the conclusions with respect to compliance with safety standards are based only on simulations. Regulators have requested that these conclusions be supported by experimental evidence. The objectives of this study are 1) to test if the hypothesis that the specific anthropomorphic mannequin (SAM) used in standardized compliance testing is also conservative for homogeneous child head models and 2) to validate the numerical prediction of the peak spatial SAR (psSAR) in child head phantoms. To achieve these objectives, head phantoms of 3- and 8-year-old children were developed and manufactured. The results confirm that SAM is also conservative for child head phantoms, and that the agreement between numerical and experimental values are within the combined uncertainty of 0.9 dB, provided that the actual peak spatial SAR (psSAR) is determined. The results also demonstrate that the currently suggested numerical SAR averaging procedures may underestimate the actual psSAR by more than 1.3 dB and that the currently defined limits in terms of the average of a cubic mass are impractical for non-ambiguous evaluations, i.e., for achieving inter-laboratory repeatability.

In order to determine exposure compliance with the electromagnetic fields from a base station's antenna in the far-field region, we should calculate the spatially averaged field value in a defined space. This value is calculated based on the measured value obtained at several points within the restricted space. According to the ICNIRP guidelines, at each point in the space, the reference levels are averaged over any 6 min (from 100 kHz to 10 GHz) for the general public. Therefore, the more points we use, the longer the measurement time becomes. For practical application, it is very advantageous to spend less time for measurement. In this paper, we analyzed the difference of average values between 6 min and lesser periods and compared it with the standard uncertainty for measurement drift. Based on the standard deviation from the 6 min averaging value, the proposed minimum averaging time is 1 min.

Force curves obtained from an elastic contact theory are shown and compared with experimental results. In the elastic contact theory, a pin-on-disk contact is assumed and the following interaction are taken into consideration; (i) elastic deformation, (ii) the specific energy of adhesion in the area of the contact, which is expressed as the difference between the surface energies and the interface energy, (iii) the long-range interaction outside the area of contact, assuming the additivity of the Lennard-Jones type potential, and (iv) another elastic term for the measurement system such as the cantilever stiffness of an atomic force microscope (AFM). In the limit when the stiffness is infinite, the theory conforms to Muller-Yushchenko-Derjaguin (MYD) theory. In the limit when the surface-surface interaction is negligible, the theory conforms to the analytical theory by Takahashi-Mizuno-Onzawa. In the limit when the stiffness is infinite and the long-range interaction outside the area of contact is negligible, the theory conforms to Johnson-Kendall-Roberts (JKR) theory. All parameters and all equations are normalized and the normalized force curve is obtained as the functional of only two parameters; (1) the normalized stiffness of the measurement system, and (2) the normalized distance which is used in the expression of the Lennard-Jones potential. The force-displacement plots are converted into force-penetration plots.