The search functionality is under construction.

Keyword Search Result

[Keyword] component carrier(2hit)

1-2hit
  • Selection of Component Carriers Using Centralized Baseband Pooling for LTE-Advanced Heterogeneous Networks

    Hiroyuki SEKI  Takaharu KOBAYASHI  Dai KIMURA  

     
    PAPER

      Vol:
    E96-B No:6
      Page(s):
    1288-1296

    Bandwidth expansion in Long Term Evolution (LTE)-Advanced is supported via carrier aggregation (CA), which aggregates multiple component carriers (CCs) to accomplish very high data rate communications. Heterogeneous networks (HetNets), which set pico-base stations in macrocells are also a key feature of LTE-Advanced to achieve substantial gains in coverage and capacity compared to macro-only cells. When CA is applied in HetNets, transmission on all CCs may not always be the best solution due to the extremely high levels of inter-cell interference experienced by HetNets. Activated CCs that are used for transmission should be selected depending on inter-cell interference conditions and the traffic offered in the cells. This paper presents a scheme to select CCs through centralized control assuming a centralized baseband unit (C-BBU) configuration. A C-BBU involves pooling tens or hundreds of baseband resources where one baseband resource can be connected to any CC installed in remote radio heads (RRHs) via optical fibers. Fewer baseband resources can be prepared in a C-BBU than those of CCs in RRHs to reduce the cost of equipment. Our proposed scheme selects the activated CCs by considering the user equipment (UE) assigned to CCs under the criterion of maximizing the proportional fairness (PF) utility function. Convex optimization using the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions is applied to solve the resource allocation ratio that enables user throughput to be estimated. We present results from system level simulations of the downlink to demonstrate that the proposed algorithm to select CCs can outperform the conventional one that selects activated CCs based on the received signal strength. We also demonstrate that our proposed algorithm to select CCs can provide a good balance in traffic load between CCs and achieve better user throughput with fewer baseband resources.

  • Investigation on Signaling Overhead for Mobility Management with Carrier Aggregation in LTE-Advanced

    Kengo YAGYU  Takeshi NAKAMORI  Hiroyuki ISHII  Mikio IWAMURA  Nobuhiko MIKI  Takahiro ASAI  Junichiro HAGIWARA  

     
    PAPER

      Vol:
    E94-B No:12
      Page(s):
    3335-3345

    In Long-Term Evolution-Advanced (LTE-A), which is currently in the process of standardization in the 3rd generation partnership project (3GPP), carrier aggregation (CA) was introduced as a main feature for bandwidth extension while maintaining backward compatibility with LTE Release 8 (Rel. 8). In the CA mode of operation, since two or more component carriers (CCs), each of which is compatible with LTE Rel. 8, are aggregated, mobility management is needed for CCs such as inter/intra-frequency handover, CC addition, and CC removal to provide sufficient coverage and better overall signal quality. Therefore, the signaling overhead for Radio Resource Control (RRC) reconfiguration for the mobility management of CCs in LTE-A is expected to be larger than that in LTE Rel. 8. In addition, CA allows aggregation of cells with different types of coverage. Therefore, the signaling overhead may be dependent on the coverage of each CC assumed in a CA deployment scenario. Furthermore, especially in a picocell-overlaid scenario, the amount of signaling overhead may be different according to whether the aggregation of CCs between a macrocell and a picocell, i.e., transmission and reception from multiple sites, is allowed or not. Therefore, this paper investigates the CC control overhead with several CC management policies in some CA deployment scenarios, including a scenario with overlaid picocells. Simulation results show that the control overhead is almost the same irrespective of the different management policies, when almost the same coverage is provided for the CCs. In addition, it is shown that the increase in the control overhead is not significant even in a CA deployment scenario with overlaid picocells. We also show that the amount of signaling overhead in a picocell-overlaid scenario with the CA between a macrocell and a picocell is almost twice as that without the CA between a macrocell and a picocell.