The completeness (i.e. confluent and terminating) property is an important concept when using a term rewriting system (TRS) as a computational model of functional programming languages. Knuth and Bendix have proposed a procedure known as the KB procedure for generating a complete TRS. A TRS cannot, however, directly handle higher-order functions that are widely used in functional programming languages. In this paper, we propose a higher-order KB procedure that extends the KB procedure to the framework of a simply-typed term rewriting system (STRS) as an extended TRS that can handle higher-order functions. We discuss the application of this higher-order KB procedure to a certification technique called inductionless induction used in program verification, and its application to fusion transformation, a typical kind of program transformation.

Automated reasoning of inductive theorems is considered important in program verification. To verify inductive theorems automatically, several implicit induction methods like the inductionless induction and the rewriting induction methods have been proposed. In studying inductive theorems on higher-order rewritings, we found that the class of the theorems shown by known implicit induction methods does not coincide with that of inductive theorems, and the gap between them is a barrier in developing mechanized methods for disproving inductive theorems. This paper fills this gap by introducing the notion of primitive inductive theorems, and clarifying the relation between inductive theorems and primitive inductive theorems. Based on this relation, we achieve mechanized methods for proving and disproving inductive theorems.