The generalized Hamming weight played an important role in coding theory. In the study of the wiretap channel of type II, the generalized Hamming weight was extended to a two-code format. Two equivalent concepts of the generalized Hamming weight hierarchy and its two-code format, are the inverse dimension/length profile (IDLP) and the inverse relative dimension/length profile (IRDLP), respectively. In this paper, the Singleton upper bound on the IRDLP is improved by using a quotient subcode set and a subset with respect to a generator matrix, respectively. If these new upper bounds on the IRDLP are achieved, in the corresponding coordinated two-party wire-tap channel of type II, the adversary cannot learn more from the illegitimate party.

In this paper, we consider linear subcodes of RMr,m whose bases are formed from the monomial basis of RMr,m by deleting ΔK monomials of degree r where ΔK < . For such subcodes, a procedure for computing the number of minimum weight codewords is presented and it is shown how to delete ΔK monomials in order to obtain a subcode with the smallest number of codewords of the minimum weight. For ΔK 3, a formula for the number of codewords of the minimum weight is presented. A (64,40) subcode of RM3,6 is being considered as an inner code in a concatenated coding system for NASA's high-speed satellite communications. For (64,40) subcodes, there are three equivalent classes. For each class, the number of minimum weight codewords, that of the second smallest weight codewords and simulation results on error probabilities of soft-decision maximum likelihood decoding are presented.

In this paper, we present a lower bound for the dimension of subfield subcodes of residue Goppa codes on the curve Cab, which exceeds the lower bound given by Stichtenoth when the number of check symbols is not small. We also give an illustrative example which shows that the proposed bound for the dimension of certain residue Goppa code exceeds the true dimension of a BCH code with the same code length and designed distance.

In this paper, we give a new lower bound for the dimension of subfield subcodes. This bound improves the lower bound given by Stichtenoth. A BCH code and a subfield subcode of algebraic geometric code on a hyper elliptic curve are discussed as special cases.