The Advantages of a DRAM-Based Digital Architecture for Low-Power, Large-Scale Neuro-Chips
Summary :
The advantages of a neuro-chip architecture based on a DRAM are demonstrated through a discussion of the general issuse regarding a memory based neuro-chip architecture and a comparison with a chip based on an SRAM. The performance of both chips is compared assuming digital operation, a 1.5-V supply voltage, a 106-synapse neural network capability, and a 0.5-µm CMOS design rule. The use of a one-transistor DRAM cell array for the storage of synapse weights results in a chip 55% smaller than an SRAM based chip with the same 8-Mbit memory capacity and the same number of processing elements. No additional operations for refreshing the DRAM cell array are necessary during the processing of the neural networks. This is because all the synapse weights in the array are transferred to the processing elements during the processing and the DRAM cells in the array are automatically refreshed when they are selected. The precharge operation of the DRAM cell array degrades the processing speed, however a processing speed of 1.37 GCPS is expected for the DRAM based chip. That speed is comparable to the 1.71 GCPS for the SRAM based chip with the same 256 parallel-processing elements. A DRAM cell array has the additional advantage of lower power dissipation in this specific usage for the neuro-chip. The dynamic operation of the DRAM cell array results in a 10% lower operating power dissipation than a chip using an SRAM cell array at the same processing speed of 1.37 GCPS. That lower operating power dissipation enables a DRAM based chip to run on a 1.5-V dry cell for longer under intermittent daily use even though the SRAM cell array has little power dissipation in data-holding mode.
- Publication
- IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Electronics Vol.E76-C No.7 pp.1206-1214
- Publication Date
- 1993/07/25
- Publicized
- Online ISSN
- DOI
- Type of Manuscript
- Special Section PAPER (Special Issue on New Architecture LSIs)
- Category
- Neural Networks and Chips
Authors
Keyword
Latest Issue
Copyrights notice of machine-translated contents
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Cite this
Copy
Takao WATANABE, Masakazu AOKI, Katsutaka KIMURA, Takeshi SAKATA, Kiyoo ITOH, "The Advantages of a DRAM-Based Digital Architecture for Low-Power, Large-Scale Neuro-Chips" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Electronics,
vol. E76-C, no. 7, pp. 1206-1214, July 1993, doi: .
Abstract: The advantages of a neuro-chip architecture based on a DRAM are demonstrated through a discussion of the general issuse regarding a memory based neuro-chip architecture and a comparison with a chip based on an SRAM. The performance of both chips is compared assuming digital operation, a 1.5-V supply voltage, a 106-synapse neural network capability, and a 0.5-µm CMOS design rule. The use of a one-transistor DRAM cell array for the storage of synapse weights results in a chip 55% smaller than an SRAM based chip with the same 8-Mbit memory capacity and the same number of processing elements. No additional operations for refreshing the DRAM cell array are necessary during the processing of the neural networks. This is because all the synapse weights in the array are transferred to the processing elements during the processing and the DRAM cells in the array are automatically refreshed when they are selected. The precharge operation of the DRAM cell array degrades the processing speed, however a processing speed of 1.37 GCPS is expected for the DRAM based chip. That speed is comparable to the 1.71 GCPS for the SRAM based chip with the same 256 parallel-processing elements. A DRAM cell array has the additional advantage of lower power dissipation in this specific usage for the neuro-chip. The dynamic operation of the DRAM cell array results in a 10% lower operating power dissipation than a chip using an SRAM cell array at the same processing speed of 1.37 GCPS. That lower operating power dissipation enables a DRAM based chip to run on a 1.5-V dry cell for longer under intermittent daily use even though the SRAM cell array has little power dissipation in data-holding mode.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/electronics/10.1587/e76-c_7_1206/_p
Copy
@ARTICLE{e76-c_7_1206,
author={Takao WATANABE, Masakazu AOKI, Katsutaka KIMURA, Takeshi SAKATA, Kiyoo ITOH, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Electronics},
title={The Advantages of a DRAM-Based Digital Architecture for Low-Power, Large-Scale Neuro-Chips},
year={1993},
volume={E76-C},
number={7},
pages={1206-1214},
abstract={The advantages of a neuro-chip architecture based on a DRAM are demonstrated through a discussion of the general issuse regarding a memory based neuro-chip architecture and a comparison with a chip based on an SRAM. The performance of both chips is compared assuming digital operation, a 1.5-V supply voltage, a 106-synapse neural network capability, and a 0.5-µm CMOS design rule. The use of a one-transistor DRAM cell array for the storage of synapse weights results in a chip 55% smaller than an SRAM based chip with the same 8-Mbit memory capacity and the same number of processing elements. No additional operations for refreshing the DRAM cell array are necessary during the processing of the neural networks. This is because all the synapse weights in the array are transferred to the processing elements during the processing and the DRAM cells in the array are automatically refreshed when they are selected. The precharge operation of the DRAM cell array degrades the processing speed, however a processing speed of 1.37 GCPS is expected for the DRAM based chip. That speed is comparable to the 1.71 GCPS for the SRAM based chip with the same 256 parallel-processing elements. A DRAM cell array has the additional advantage of lower power dissipation in this specific usage for the neuro-chip. The dynamic operation of the DRAM cell array results in a 10% lower operating power dissipation than a chip using an SRAM cell array at the same processing speed of 1.37 GCPS. That lower operating power dissipation enables a DRAM based chip to run on a 1.5-V dry cell for longer under intermittent daily use even though the SRAM cell array has little power dissipation in data-holding mode.},
keywords={},
doi={},
ISSN={},
month={July},}
Copy
TY - JOUR
TI - The Advantages of a DRAM-Based Digital Architecture for Low-Power, Large-Scale Neuro-Chips
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Electronics
SP - 1206
EP - 1214
AU - Takao WATANABE
AU - Masakazu AOKI
AU - Katsutaka KIMURA
AU - Takeshi SAKATA
AU - Kiyoo ITOH
PY - 1993
DO -
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Electronics
SN -
VL - E76-C
IS - 7
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Electronics
Y1 - July 1993
AB - The advantages of a neuro-chip architecture based on a DRAM are demonstrated through a discussion of the general issuse regarding a memory based neuro-chip architecture and a comparison with a chip based on an SRAM. The performance of both chips is compared assuming digital operation, a 1.5-V supply voltage, a 106-synapse neural network capability, and a 0.5-µm CMOS design rule. The use of a one-transistor DRAM cell array for the storage of synapse weights results in a chip 55% smaller than an SRAM based chip with the same 8-Mbit memory capacity and the same number of processing elements. No additional operations for refreshing the DRAM cell array are necessary during the processing of the neural networks. This is because all the synapse weights in the array are transferred to the processing elements during the processing and the DRAM cells in the array are automatically refreshed when they are selected. The precharge operation of the DRAM cell array degrades the processing speed, however a processing speed of 1.37 GCPS is expected for the DRAM based chip. That speed is comparable to the 1.71 GCPS for the SRAM based chip with the same 256 parallel-processing elements. A DRAM cell array has the additional advantage of lower power dissipation in this specific usage for the neuro-chip. The dynamic operation of the DRAM cell array results in a 10% lower operating power dissipation than a chip using an SRAM cell array at the same processing speed of 1.37 GCPS. That lower operating power dissipation enables a DRAM based chip to run on a 1.5-V dry cell for longer under intermittent daily use even though the SRAM cell array has little power dissipation in data-holding mode.
ER -
English
