IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals
Future Direction and Roadmap of Concurrent System Technology
Summary :
Recently, technology roadmaps have been actively constructed by various organizations such as governments, industry segments, academic societies and companies [1]. While the common basic purpose of these roadmaps is sharing common recognition of the technology among stakeholders, there exists a specific role for each organization. One of the important roles of academic societies is to show the directions in which society is moving. The IEICE technical group on Concurrent System Technology (CST) established in 1993 stands at a turning point and needs to move forward in new directions after more than a decade of activities and contributions. However, neither top-down (market-pull/requirements-pull) nor bottom-up (technology-push) roadmapping is suitable for CST because CST is a kind of systems engineering. This paper proposes a new technology roadmapping methodology (middle-up-down technology roadmapping) for systems engineering and shows three future directions of CST and one roadmap for service systems that integrate CST and services science.
- Publication
- IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals Vol.E90-A No.11 pp.2443-2448
- Publication Date
- 2007/11/01
- Publicized
- Online ISSN
- 1745-1337
- DOI
- 10.1093/ietfec/e90-a.11.2443
- Type of Manuscript
- Special Section INVITED PAPER (Special Section on Concurrent/Hybrid Systems: Theory and Applications)
- Category
Authors
Keyword
Latest Issue
Copyrights notice of machine-translated contents
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Cite this
Copy
Naoshi UCHIHIRA, "Future Direction and Roadmap of Concurrent System Technology" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals,
vol. E90-A, no. 11, pp. 2443-2448, November 2007, doi: 10.1093/ietfec/e90-a.11.2443.
Abstract: Recently, technology roadmaps have been actively constructed by various organizations such as governments, industry segments, academic societies and companies [1]. While the common basic purpose of these roadmaps is sharing common recognition of the technology among stakeholders, there exists a specific role for each organization. One of the important roles of academic societies is to show the directions in which society is moving. The IEICE technical group on Concurrent System Technology (CST) established in 1993 stands at a turning point and needs to move forward in new directions after more than a decade of activities and contributions. However, neither top-down (market-pull/requirements-pull) nor bottom-up (technology-push) roadmapping is suitable for CST because CST is a kind of systems engineering. This paper proposes a new technology roadmapping methodology (middle-up-down technology roadmapping) for systems engineering and shows three future directions of CST and one roadmap for service systems that integrate CST and services science.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/fundamentals/10.1093/ietfec/e90-a.11.2443/_p
Copy
@ARTICLE{e90-a_11_2443,
author={Naoshi UCHIHIRA, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals},
title={Future Direction and Roadmap of Concurrent System Technology},
year={2007},
volume={E90-A},
number={11},
pages={2443-2448},
abstract={Recently, technology roadmaps have been actively constructed by various organizations such as governments, industry segments, academic societies and companies [1]. While the common basic purpose of these roadmaps is sharing common recognition of the technology among stakeholders, there exists a specific role for each organization. One of the important roles of academic societies is to show the directions in which society is moving. The IEICE technical group on Concurrent System Technology (CST) established in 1993 stands at a turning point and needs to move forward in new directions after more than a decade of activities and contributions. However, neither top-down (market-pull/requirements-pull) nor bottom-up (technology-push) roadmapping is suitable for CST because CST is a kind of systems engineering. This paper proposes a new technology roadmapping methodology (middle-up-down technology roadmapping) for systems engineering and shows three future directions of CST and one roadmap for service systems that integrate CST and services science.},
keywords={},
doi={10.1093/ietfec/e90-a.11.2443},
ISSN={1745-1337},
month={November},}
Copy
TY - JOUR
TI - Future Direction and Roadmap of Concurrent System Technology
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals
SP - 2443
EP - 2448
AU - Naoshi UCHIHIRA
PY - 2007
DO - 10.1093/ietfec/e90-a.11.2443
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals
SN - 1745-1337
VL - E90-A
IS - 11
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals
Y1 - November 2007
AB - Recently, technology roadmaps have been actively constructed by various organizations such as governments, industry segments, academic societies and companies [1]. While the common basic purpose of these roadmaps is sharing common recognition of the technology among stakeholders, there exists a specific role for each organization. One of the important roles of academic societies is to show the directions in which society is moving. The IEICE technical group on Concurrent System Technology (CST) established in 1993 stands at a turning point and needs to move forward in new directions after more than a decade of activities and contributions. However, neither top-down (market-pull/requirements-pull) nor bottom-up (technology-push) roadmapping is suitable for CST because CST is a kind of systems engineering. This paper proposes a new technology roadmapping methodology (middle-up-down technology roadmapping) for systems engineering and shows three future directions of CST and one roadmap for service systems that integrate CST and services science.
ER -
English
