Support by Warning or by Action: Which is Appropriate under Mismatches between Driver Intent and Traffic Conditions?

Toshiyuki INAGAKI; Makoto ITOH; Yoshitomo NAGAI

doi:10.1093/ietfec/e90-a.11.2540

Support by Warning or by Action: Which is Appropriate under Mismatches between Driver Intent and Traffic Conditions?

Toshiyuki INAGAKI, Makoto ITOH, Yoshitomo NAGAI

Full Text Views

0

Cite this

Summary :

This paper tries to answer the following question: What type of support should be given to an automobile driver when it is determined, via some method to monitor the driver's behavior and the traffic environment, that the driver's intent may not be appropriate to a traffic condition? With a medium fidelity, moving-base driving simulator, three conditions were compared: (a) Warning type support in which an auditory warning is given to the driver to enhance his/her situation recognition, (b) action type support in which an autonomous safety control action is executed to avoid an accident, and (c) the baseline condition in which no driver support is given. Results were as follows: (1) Either type of driver support was effective in accident prevention. (2) Acceptance of driver support functions varied context dependently. (3) Participants accepted a system-initiated automation invocation as long as no automation surprises were possible to occur.

Publication: IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals Vol.E90-A No.11 pp.2540-2545

Publication Date: 2007/11/01

Publicized

Online ISSN: 1745-1337

DOI: 10.1093/ietfec/e90-a.11.2540

Type of Manuscript: PAPER

Category: Reliability, Maintainability and Safety Analysis

Cite this

Copy

Toshiyuki INAGAKI, Makoto ITOH, Yoshitomo NAGAI, "Support by Warning or by Action: Which is Appropriate under Mismatches between Driver Intent and Traffic Conditions?" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals, vol. E90-A, no. 11, pp. 2540-2545, November 2007, doi: 10.1093/ietfec/e90-a.11.2540.
Abstract: This paper tries to answer the following question: What type of support should be given to an automobile driver when it is determined, via some method to monitor the driver's behavior and the traffic environment, that the driver's intent may not be appropriate to a traffic condition? With a medium fidelity, moving-base driving simulator, three conditions were compared: (a) Warning type support in which an auditory warning is given to the driver to enhance his/her situation recognition, (b) action type support in which an autonomous safety control action is executed to avoid an accident, and (c) the baseline condition in which no driver support is given. Results were as follows: (1) Either type of driver support was effective in accident prevention. (2) Acceptance of driver support functions varied context dependently. (3) Participants accepted a system-initiated automation invocation as long as no automation surprises were possible to occur.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/fundamentals/10.1093/ietfec/e90-a.11.2540/_p

Copy

@ARTICLE{e90-a_11_2540,
author={Toshiyuki INAGAKI, Makoto ITOH, Yoshitomo NAGAI, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals},
title={Support by Warning or by Action: Which is Appropriate under Mismatches between Driver Intent and Traffic Conditions?},
year={2007},
volume={E90-A},
number={11},
pages={2540-2545},
abstract={This paper tries to answer the following question: What type of support should be given to an automobile driver when it is determined, via some method to monitor the driver's behavior and the traffic environment, that the driver's intent may not be appropriate to a traffic condition? With a medium fidelity, moving-base driving simulator, three conditions were compared: (a) Warning type support in which an auditory warning is given to the driver to enhance his/her situation recognition, (b) action type support in which an autonomous safety control action is executed to avoid an accident, and (c) the baseline condition in which no driver support is given. Results were as follows: (1) Either type of driver support was effective in accident prevention. (2) Acceptance of driver support functions varied context dependently. (3) Participants accepted a system-initiated automation invocation as long as no automation surprises were possible to occur.},
keywords={},
doi={10.1093/ietfec/e90-a.11.2540},
ISSN={1745-1337},
month={November},}

Copy

TY - JOUR
TI - Support by Warning or by Action: Which is Appropriate under Mismatches between Driver Intent and Traffic Conditions?
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals
SP - 2540
EP - 2545
AU - Toshiyuki INAGAKI
AU - Makoto ITOH
AU - Yoshitomo NAGAI
PY - 2007
DO - 10.1093/ietfec/e90-a.11.2540
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals
SN - 1745-1337
VL - E90-A
IS - 11
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals
Y1 - November 2007
AB - This paper tries to answer the following question: What type of support should be given to an automobile driver when it is determined, via some method to monitor the driver's behavior and the traffic environment, that the driver's intent may not be appropriate to a traffic condition? With a medium fidelity, moving-base driving simulator, three conditions were compared: (a) Warning type support in which an auditory warning is given to the driver to enhance his/her situation recognition, (b) action type support in which an autonomous safety control action is executed to avoid an accident, and (c) the baseline condition in which no driver support is given. Results were as follows: (1) Either type of driver support was effective in accident prevention. (2) Acceptance of driver support functions varied context dependently. (3) Participants accepted a system-initiated automation invocation as long as no automation surprises were possible to occur.
ER -