This paper addresses a pipelined partial rolling (PPR) architecture for the AES encryption. The key technique is the PPR architecture. With the proposed architecture on the Altera Stratix FPGA, two PPR implementations achieve 6.45 Gbps throughput and 12.78 Gbps throughput, respectively. Compared with the unrolling implementation that achieves a throughput of 22.75 Gbps on the same FPGA, the two PPR implementations improve the memory efficiency (i.e., throughput divided by the size of memory for core) by 13.4% and 12.3%, respectively, and reduce the amount of the memory by 75% and 50%, respectively. Also, the PPR implementation has a up to 9.83% higher memory efficiency than the fastest previous FPGA implementation known to date. In terms of resource efficiency (i.e., throughput divided by the equivalent logic element or slice), one PPR implementation offers almost the same as the rolling implementation, and the other PPR implementation offers a medium value between the rolling implementation and the unrolling implementation that has the highest resource efficiency. However, the two PPR implementations can be implemented on the minimum-sized Stratix FPGA while the unrolling implementation cannot. The PPR architecture fills the gap between unrolling and rolling architectures and is suitable for small and medium-sized FPGAs.
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Copy
Hui QIN, Tsutomu SASAO, Yukihiro IGUCHI, "A Design of AES Encryption Circuit with 128-bit Keys Using Look-Up Table Ring on FPGA" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information,
vol. E89-D, no. 3, pp. 1139-1147, March 2006, doi: 10.1093/ietisy/e89-d.3.1139.
Abstract: This paper addresses a pipelined partial rolling (PPR) architecture for the AES encryption. The key technique is the PPR architecture. With the proposed architecture on the Altera Stratix FPGA, two PPR implementations achieve 6.45 Gbps throughput and 12.78 Gbps throughput, respectively. Compared with the unrolling implementation that achieves a throughput of 22.75 Gbps on the same FPGA, the two PPR implementations improve the memory efficiency (i.e., throughput divided by the size of memory for core) by 13.4% and 12.3%, respectively, and reduce the amount of the memory by 75% and 50%, respectively. Also, the PPR implementation has a up to 9.83% higher memory efficiency than the fastest previous FPGA implementation known to date. In terms of resource efficiency (i.e., throughput divided by the equivalent logic element or slice), one PPR implementation offers almost the same as the rolling implementation, and the other PPR implementation offers a medium value between the rolling implementation and the unrolling implementation that has the highest resource efficiency. However, the two PPR implementations can be implemented on the minimum-sized Stratix FPGA while the unrolling implementation cannot. The PPR architecture fills the gap between unrolling and rolling architectures and is suitable for small and medium-sized FPGAs.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/information/10.1093/ietisy/e89-d.3.1139/_p
Copy
@ARTICLE{e89-d_3_1139,
author={Hui QIN, Tsutomu SASAO, Yukihiro IGUCHI, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information},
title={A Design of AES Encryption Circuit with 128-bit Keys Using Look-Up Table Ring on FPGA},
year={2006},
volume={E89-D},
number={3},
pages={1139-1147},
abstract={This paper addresses a pipelined partial rolling (PPR) architecture for the AES encryption. The key technique is the PPR architecture. With the proposed architecture on the Altera Stratix FPGA, two PPR implementations achieve 6.45 Gbps throughput and 12.78 Gbps throughput, respectively. Compared with the unrolling implementation that achieves a throughput of 22.75 Gbps on the same FPGA, the two PPR implementations improve the memory efficiency (i.e., throughput divided by the size of memory for core) by 13.4% and 12.3%, respectively, and reduce the amount of the memory by 75% and 50%, respectively. Also, the PPR implementation has a up to 9.83% higher memory efficiency than the fastest previous FPGA implementation known to date. In terms of resource efficiency (i.e., throughput divided by the equivalent logic element or slice), one PPR implementation offers almost the same as the rolling implementation, and the other PPR implementation offers a medium value between the rolling implementation and the unrolling implementation that has the highest resource efficiency. However, the two PPR implementations can be implemented on the minimum-sized Stratix FPGA while the unrolling implementation cannot. The PPR architecture fills the gap between unrolling and rolling architectures and is suitable for small and medium-sized FPGAs.},
keywords={},
doi={10.1093/ietisy/e89-d.3.1139},
ISSN={1745-1361},
month={March},}
Copy
TY - JOUR
TI - A Design of AES Encryption Circuit with 128-bit Keys Using Look-Up Table Ring on FPGA
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
SP - 1139
EP - 1147
AU - Hui QIN
AU - Tsutomu SASAO
AU - Yukihiro IGUCHI
PY - 2006
DO - 10.1093/ietisy/e89-d.3.1139
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
SN - 1745-1361
VL - E89-D
IS - 3
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
Y1 - March 2006
AB - This paper addresses a pipelined partial rolling (PPR) architecture for the AES encryption. The key technique is the PPR architecture. With the proposed architecture on the Altera Stratix FPGA, two PPR implementations achieve 6.45 Gbps throughput and 12.78 Gbps throughput, respectively. Compared with the unrolling implementation that achieves a throughput of 22.75 Gbps on the same FPGA, the two PPR implementations improve the memory efficiency (i.e., throughput divided by the size of memory for core) by 13.4% and 12.3%, respectively, and reduce the amount of the memory by 75% and 50%, respectively. Also, the PPR implementation has a up to 9.83% higher memory efficiency than the fastest previous FPGA implementation known to date. In terms of resource efficiency (i.e., throughput divided by the equivalent logic element or slice), one PPR implementation offers almost the same as the rolling implementation, and the other PPR implementation offers a medium value between the rolling implementation and the unrolling implementation that has the highest resource efficiency. However, the two PPR implementations can be implemented on the minimum-sized Stratix FPGA while the unrolling implementation cannot. The PPR architecture fills the gap between unrolling and rolling architectures and is suitable for small and medium-sized FPGAs.
ER -