For reversal complexity on an off-line Turing machine, which is a Turing machine with a read-only two-way input tape except work-tapes, we can consider two kinds of definition; the first one is a definition in which the number of reversals over the input tape is not counted, and the second one is a definition in which it is counted. Unlike time and space complexities, whether or not there is any difference between these two definitions does not seem to be trivial. In this paper, we will show the following results: (1) let S(n) be any function, and R(n) be an (R(n), S(n)) reversal-space constructible function. Then, DRESPk(R(n), S(n))
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Copy
Hiroaki YAMAMOTO, "On the Power of Reversals Over the Input Tape of Off-Line Turing Machines" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information,
vol. E79-D, no. 11, pp. 1495-1502, November 1996, doi: .
Abstract: For reversal complexity on an off-line Turing machine, which is a Turing machine with a read-only two-way input tape except work-tapes, we can consider two kinds of definition; the first one is a definition in which the number of reversals over the input tape is not counted, and the second one is a definition in which it is counted. Unlike time and space complexities, whether or not there is any difference between these two definitions does not seem to be trivial. In this paper, we will show the following results: (1) let S(n) be any function, and R(n) be an (R(n), S(n)) reversal-space constructible function. Then, DRESPk(R(n), S(n))
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/information/10.1587/e79-d_11_1495/_p
Copy
@ARTICLE{e79-d_11_1495,
author={Hiroaki YAMAMOTO, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information},
title={On the Power of Reversals Over the Input Tape of Off-Line Turing Machines},
year={1996},
volume={E79-D},
number={11},
pages={1495-1502},
abstract={For reversal complexity on an off-line Turing machine, which is a Turing machine with a read-only two-way input tape except work-tapes, we can consider two kinds of definition; the first one is a definition in which the number of reversals over the input tape is not counted, and the second one is a definition in which it is counted. Unlike time and space complexities, whether or not there is any difference between these two definitions does not seem to be trivial. In this paper, we will show the following results: (1) let S(n) be any function, and R(n) be an (R(n), S(n)) reversal-space constructible function. Then, DRESPk(R(n), S(n))
keywords={},
doi={},
ISSN={},
month={November},}
Copy
TY - JOUR
TI - On the Power of Reversals Over the Input Tape of Off-Line Turing Machines
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
SP - 1495
EP - 1502
AU - Hiroaki YAMAMOTO
PY - 1996
DO -
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
SN -
VL - E79-D
IS - 11
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
Y1 - November 1996
AB - For reversal complexity on an off-line Turing machine, which is a Turing machine with a read-only two-way input tape except work-tapes, we can consider two kinds of definition; the first one is a definition in which the number of reversals over the input tape is not counted, and the second one is a definition in which it is counted. Unlike time and space complexities, whether or not there is any difference between these two definitions does not seem to be trivial. In this paper, we will show the following results: (1) let S(n) be any function, and R(n) be an (R(n), S(n)) reversal-space constructible function. Then, DRESPk(R(n), S(n))
ER -