We discuss human collaborative discovery processes using a production system model as a cognitive simulator. We have developed an interactive production system architecture to construct the simulator. Two production systems interactively find targets in which the only experimental results are shared; each does not know the hypothesis the other system has. Through this kind of interaction, we verify whether or not the performance of two systems interactively finding targets exceeds that of two systems independently finding targets. If we confirm the superiority of collaborative discovery, we approve of emergence by the interaction. The results are: (1) generally speaking collaboration does not produces the emergence defined above, and (2) as the different degree of hypothesis testing strategies that the two system use gets larger, the benefits of interaction gradually increases.
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Copy
Kazuhisa MIWA, "A Study of Collaborative Discovery Processes Using a Cognitive Simulator" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information,
vol. E83-D, no. 12, pp. 2088-2097, December 2000, doi: .
Abstract: We discuss human collaborative discovery processes using a production system model as a cognitive simulator. We have developed an interactive production system architecture to construct the simulator. Two production systems interactively find targets in which the only experimental results are shared; each does not know the hypothesis the other system has. Through this kind of interaction, we verify whether or not the performance of two systems interactively finding targets exceeds that of two systems independently finding targets. If we confirm the superiority of collaborative discovery, we approve of emergence by the interaction. The results are: (1) generally speaking collaboration does not produces the emergence defined above, and (2) as the different degree of hypothesis testing strategies that the two system use gets larger, the benefits of interaction gradually increases.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/information/10.1587/e83-d_12_2088/_p
Copy
@ARTICLE{e83-d_12_2088,
author={Kazuhisa MIWA, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information},
title={A Study of Collaborative Discovery Processes Using a Cognitive Simulator},
year={2000},
volume={E83-D},
number={12},
pages={2088-2097},
abstract={We discuss human collaborative discovery processes using a production system model as a cognitive simulator. We have developed an interactive production system architecture to construct the simulator. Two production systems interactively find targets in which the only experimental results are shared; each does not know the hypothesis the other system has. Through this kind of interaction, we verify whether or not the performance of two systems interactively finding targets exceeds that of two systems independently finding targets. If we confirm the superiority of collaborative discovery, we approve of emergence by the interaction. The results are: (1) generally speaking collaboration does not produces the emergence defined above, and (2) as the different degree of hypothesis testing strategies that the two system use gets larger, the benefits of interaction gradually increases.},
keywords={},
doi={},
ISSN={},
month={December},}
Copy
TY - JOUR
TI - A Study of Collaborative Discovery Processes Using a Cognitive Simulator
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
SP - 2088
EP - 2097
AU - Kazuhisa MIWA
PY - 2000
DO -
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
SN -
VL - E83-D
IS - 12
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
Y1 - December 2000
AB - We discuss human collaborative discovery processes using a production system model as a cognitive simulator. We have developed an interactive production system architecture to construct the simulator. Two production systems interactively find targets in which the only experimental results are shared; each does not know the hypothesis the other system has. Through this kind of interaction, we verify whether or not the performance of two systems interactively finding targets exceeds that of two systems independently finding targets. If we confirm the superiority of collaborative discovery, we approve of emergence by the interaction. The results are: (1) generally speaking collaboration does not produces the emergence defined above, and (2) as the different degree of hypothesis testing strategies that the two system use gets larger, the benefits of interaction gradually increases.
ER -