We compared two edge-blending methods for multi-projection displays, elliptic and rectangular blending, by simulating three common situations: (1) an inaccurately estimated calibration parameter, (2) a worn projector lamp, and (3) a shifted viewpoint. We used a two-level-of-detail display including a high-gain rear-projection screen in the simulation to demonstrate an extreme case. The comparisons showed how strongly inaccurate elements affect a composite besides affecting the appearance itself. A subjective assessment was also carried out to obtain the evaluations of actual users. The simulation results showed that in many cases elliptic blending is more effective than rectangular blending.
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Copy
Tsuyoshi MINAKAWA, Masami YAMASAKI, "Elliptic vs. Rectangular Blending for Multi-Projection Displays" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information,
vol. E87-D, no. 6, pp. 1517-1526, June 2004, doi: .
Abstract: We compared two edge-blending methods for multi-projection displays, elliptic and rectangular blending, by simulating three common situations: (1) an inaccurately estimated calibration parameter, (2) a worn projector lamp, and (3) a shifted viewpoint. We used a two-level-of-detail display including a high-gain rear-projection screen in the simulation to demonstrate an extreme case. The comparisons showed how strongly inaccurate elements affect a composite besides affecting the appearance itself. A subjective assessment was also carried out to obtain the evaluations of actual users. The simulation results showed that in many cases elliptic blending is more effective than rectangular blending.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/information/10.1587/e87-d_6_1517/_p
Copy
@ARTICLE{e87-d_6_1517,
author={Tsuyoshi MINAKAWA, Masami YAMASAKI, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information},
title={Elliptic vs. Rectangular Blending for Multi-Projection Displays},
year={2004},
volume={E87-D},
number={6},
pages={1517-1526},
abstract={We compared two edge-blending methods for multi-projection displays, elliptic and rectangular blending, by simulating three common situations: (1) an inaccurately estimated calibration parameter, (2) a worn projector lamp, and (3) a shifted viewpoint. We used a two-level-of-detail display including a high-gain rear-projection screen in the simulation to demonstrate an extreme case. The comparisons showed how strongly inaccurate elements affect a composite besides affecting the appearance itself. A subjective assessment was also carried out to obtain the evaluations of actual users. The simulation results showed that in many cases elliptic blending is more effective than rectangular blending.},
keywords={},
doi={},
ISSN={},
month={June},}
Copy
TY - JOUR
TI - Elliptic vs. Rectangular Blending for Multi-Projection Displays
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
SP - 1517
EP - 1526
AU - Tsuyoshi MINAKAWA
AU - Masami YAMASAKI
PY - 2004
DO -
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
SN -
VL - E87-D
IS - 6
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
Y1 - June 2004
AB - We compared two edge-blending methods for multi-projection displays, elliptic and rectangular blending, by simulating three common situations: (1) an inaccurately estimated calibration parameter, (2) a worn projector lamp, and (3) a shifted viewpoint. We used a two-level-of-detail display including a high-gain rear-projection screen in the simulation to demonstrate an extreme case. The comparisons showed how strongly inaccurate elements affect a composite besides affecting the appearance itself. A subjective assessment was also carried out to obtain the evaluations of actual users. The simulation results showed that in many cases elliptic blending is more effective than rectangular blending.
ER -