To enhance the privacy of vehicle owners, combinatorial certificate management schemes assign each certificate to a large enough group of vehicles so that it will be difficult to link a certificate to any particular vehicle. When an innocent vehicle shares a certificate with a misbehaving vehicle and the certificate on the misbehaving vehicle has been revoked, the certificate on the innocent vehicle also becomes invalid and is said to be covered. When a group of misbehaving vehicles collectively share all the certificates assigned to an innocent vehicle and these certificates are revoked, the innocent vehicle is said to be covered. We point out that the previous analysis of the vehicle cover probability is not correct and then provide a new and exact analysis of the vehicle cover probability.
Dae Hyun YUM
Myongji University
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Copy
Dae Hyun YUM, "On the Probability of Certificate Revocation in Combinatorial Certificate Management Schemes" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information,
vol. E98-D, no. 5, pp. 1104-1107, May 2015, doi: 10.1587/transinf.2015EDL8012.
Abstract: To enhance the privacy of vehicle owners, combinatorial certificate management schemes assign each certificate to a large enough group of vehicles so that it will be difficult to link a certificate to any particular vehicle. When an innocent vehicle shares a certificate with a misbehaving vehicle and the certificate on the misbehaving vehicle has been revoked, the certificate on the innocent vehicle also becomes invalid and is said to be covered. When a group of misbehaving vehicles collectively share all the certificates assigned to an innocent vehicle and these certificates are revoked, the innocent vehicle is said to be covered. We point out that the previous analysis of the vehicle cover probability is not correct and then provide a new and exact analysis of the vehicle cover probability.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/information/10.1587/transinf.2015EDL8012/_p
Copy
@ARTICLE{e98-d_5_1104,
author={Dae Hyun YUM, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information},
title={On the Probability of Certificate Revocation in Combinatorial Certificate Management Schemes},
year={2015},
volume={E98-D},
number={5},
pages={1104-1107},
abstract={To enhance the privacy of vehicle owners, combinatorial certificate management schemes assign each certificate to a large enough group of vehicles so that it will be difficult to link a certificate to any particular vehicle. When an innocent vehicle shares a certificate with a misbehaving vehicle and the certificate on the misbehaving vehicle has been revoked, the certificate on the innocent vehicle also becomes invalid and is said to be covered. When a group of misbehaving vehicles collectively share all the certificates assigned to an innocent vehicle and these certificates are revoked, the innocent vehicle is said to be covered. We point out that the previous analysis of the vehicle cover probability is not correct and then provide a new and exact analysis of the vehicle cover probability.},
keywords={},
doi={10.1587/transinf.2015EDL8012},
ISSN={1745-1361},
month={May},}
Copy
TY - JOUR
TI - On the Probability of Certificate Revocation in Combinatorial Certificate Management Schemes
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
SP - 1104
EP - 1107
AU - Dae Hyun YUM
PY - 2015
DO - 10.1587/transinf.2015EDL8012
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
SN - 1745-1361
VL - E98-D
IS - 5
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
Y1 - May 2015
AB - To enhance the privacy of vehicle owners, combinatorial certificate management schemes assign each certificate to a large enough group of vehicles so that it will be difficult to link a certificate to any particular vehicle. When an innocent vehicle shares a certificate with a misbehaving vehicle and the certificate on the misbehaving vehicle has been revoked, the certificate on the innocent vehicle also becomes invalid and is said to be covered. When a group of misbehaving vehicles collectively share all the certificates assigned to an innocent vehicle and these certificates are revoked, the innocent vehicle is said to be covered. We point out that the previous analysis of the vehicle cover probability is not correct and then provide a new and exact analysis of the vehicle cover probability.
ER -