A Model to Explain Quality Improvement Effect of Peer Reviews
Summary :
Through the analysis of Rayleigh model, an explanatory model for the quality effect of peer reviews is constructed. The review activities are evaluated by the defect removal rate at each phase. We made hypotheses on how these measurements are related to the product quality. These hypotheses are verified through regression analysis of actual project data, and concrete calculation formulae are obtained as a model. Making use of the mechanism to construct this model, we can develop a method for making concrete review plan and setting objective values to manage on-going review activities.
- Publication
- IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information Vol.E93-D No.1 pp.43-49
- Publication Date
- 2010/01/01
- Publicized
- Online ISSN
- 1745-1361
- DOI
- 10.1587/transinf.E93.D.43
- Type of Manuscript
- PAPER
- Category
- Software Engineering
Authors
Keyword
Latest Issue
Copyrights notice of machine-translated contents
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Cite this
Copy
Mutsumi KOMURO, Norihisa KOMODA, "A Model to Explain Quality Improvement Effect of Peer Reviews" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information,
vol. E93-D, no. 1, pp. 43-49, January 2010, doi: 10.1587/transinf.E93.D.43.
Abstract: Through the analysis of Rayleigh model, an explanatory model for the quality effect of peer reviews is constructed. The review activities are evaluated by the defect removal rate at each phase. We made hypotheses on how these measurements are related to the product quality. These hypotheses are verified through regression analysis of actual project data, and concrete calculation formulae are obtained as a model. Making use of the mechanism to construct this model, we can develop a method for making concrete review plan and setting objective values to manage on-going review activities.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/information/10.1587/transinf.E93.D.43/_p
Copy
@ARTICLE{e93-d_1_43,
author={Mutsumi KOMURO, Norihisa KOMODA, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information},
title={A Model to Explain Quality Improvement Effect of Peer Reviews},
year={2010},
volume={E93-D},
number={1},
pages={43-49},
abstract={Through the analysis of Rayleigh model, an explanatory model for the quality effect of peer reviews is constructed. The review activities are evaluated by the defect removal rate at each phase. We made hypotheses on how these measurements are related to the product quality. These hypotheses are verified through regression analysis of actual project data, and concrete calculation formulae are obtained as a model. Making use of the mechanism to construct this model, we can develop a method for making concrete review plan and setting objective values to manage on-going review activities.},
keywords={},
doi={10.1587/transinf.E93.D.43},
ISSN={1745-1361},
month={January},}
Copy
TY - JOUR
TI - A Model to Explain Quality Improvement Effect of Peer Reviews
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
SP - 43
EP - 49
AU - Mutsumi KOMURO
AU - Norihisa KOMODA
PY - 2010
DO - 10.1587/transinf.E93.D.43
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
SN - 1745-1361
VL - E93-D
IS - 1
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
Y1 - January 2010
AB - Through the analysis of Rayleigh model, an explanatory model for the quality effect of peer reviews is constructed. The review activities are evaluated by the defect removal rate at each phase. We made hypotheses on how these measurements are related to the product quality. These hypotheses are verified through regression analysis of actual project data, and concrete calculation formulae are obtained as a model. Making use of the mechanism to construct this model, we can develop a method for making concrete review plan and setting objective values to manage on-going review activities.
ER -
English
