This paper analyzes the system-level performance of Storage Class Memory (SCM)/NAND flash hybrid solid-state drives (SSDs) and SCM/NAND flash/NAND flash tri-hybrid SSDs in difference types of NAND flash memory. There are several types of NAND flash memory, i.e. 2-dimensional (2D) or 3-dimensional (3D), charge-trap type (CT) and floating-gate type (FG) and multi-level cell (MLC) or triple-level cell (TLC). In this paper, the following four types of NAND flash memory are analyzed: 1) 3D CT TLC, 2) 3D FG TLC, 3) 2D FG TLC, and 4) 2D FG MLC NAND flash. Regardless of read- and write-intensive workloads, SCM/NAND flash hybrid SSD with low cost 3D CT TLC NAND flash achieves the best performance that is 20% higher than that with higher cost 2D FG MLC NAND flash. The performance improvement of 3D CT TLC NAND flash can be obtained by the short write latency. On the other hand, in case of tri-hybrid SSD, SCM/3D CT TLC/3D CT TLC NAND flash tri-hybrid SSD improves the performance 102% compared to SCM/2D FG MLC/3D CT TLC NAND flash tri-hybrid SSD. In addition, SCM/2D FG MLC/2D FG MLC NAND flash tri-hybrid SSD shows 49% lower performance than SCM/2D FG MLC/3D CT TLC NAND flash tri-hybrid SSD. Tri-hybrid SSD flash with 3D CT TLC NAND flash is the best performance in tri-hybrid SSD thanks to larger block size and word-line (WL) write. Therefore, in 3D CT TLC NAND flash based SSDs, higher cost MLC NAND flash is not necessary for hybrid SSD and tri-hybrid SSD for data center applications.

This paper analyzes the optimal SSD configuration including emerging non-volatile memories such as quadruple-level cell (QLC) NAND flash memory [1] and storage class memories (SCMs). First, SSD performance and SSD endurance lifetime of hybrid SSD are evaluated in four configurations: 1) single-level cell (SLC)/QLC NAND flash, 2) SCM/QLC NAND flash, 3) SCM/triple-level cell (TLC)/QLC NAND flash and 4) SCM/TLC NAND flash. Furthermore, these four configurations are compared in limited cost. In case of cold workloads or high total SSD cost assumption, SCM/TLC NAND flash hybrid configuration is recommended in both SSD performance and endurance lifetime. For hot workloads with low total SSD cost assumption, however, SLC/QLC NAND flash hybrid configuration is recommended with emphasis on SSD endurance lifetime. Under the same conditions as above, SCM/TLC/QLC NAND flash tri-hybrid is the best configuration in SSD performance considering cost. In particular, for prxy_0 (write-hot workload), SCM/TLC/QLC NAND flash tri-hybrid achieves 67% higher IOPS/cost than SCM/TLC NAND flash hybrid. Moreover, the configurations with the highest IOPS/cost in each workload and cost limit are picked up and analyzed with various types of SCMs. For all cases except for the case of prxy_1 with high total SSD cost assumption, middle-end SCM (write latency: 1us, read latency: 1us) is recommended in performance considering cost. However, for prxy_1 (read-hot workload) with high total SSD cost assumption, high-end SCM (write latency: 100ns, read latency: 100ns) achieves the best performance.