1-3hit |
Yoshiyuki NAKAMURA Jacob SAVIR Hideo FUJIWARA
Built-in self-test (BIST) hardware is included today in many chips. This hardware is used to test the chip's functional circuits. Since this BIST hardware is manufactured using the same technology as the functional circuits themselves, it is possible for it to be faulty. It is important, therefore, to assess the impact of this unreliable BIST on the product defect level after test. Williams and Brown's formula, relating the product defect level as a function of the manufacturing yield and fault coverage, is re-examined in this paper. In particular, special attention is given to the influence of an unreliable BIST on this relationship. We show that when the BIST hardware is used to screen the functional product, an unreliable BIST circuitry tends, in many cases, to reduce the effective fault coverage and increase the corresponding product defect level. The BIST unreliability impact is assessed for both early life phase, and product maturity phase.
Yoshiyuki NAKAMURA Jacob SAVIR Hideo FUJIWARA
In [1] the impact of BIST on the chip defect level after test has been addressed. It was assumed in [1] that no measures are taken to ensure that the BIST circuitry is fault-free before launching the functional test. In this paper we assume that a BIST pretest is first conducted in order to get rid of all chips that fail it. Only chips whose BIST circuitry has passed the pretest are kept, while the rest are discarded. The BIST pretest, however, is assumed to have only a limited coverage against its own faults. This paper studies the product quality improvements as induced by the BIST pretest, and provides some insight as to when it may be worthwhile to perform it.
Yoshiyuki NAKAMURA Thomas CLOUQUEUR Kewal K. SALUJA Hideo FUJIWARA
In this paper, we provide a practical formulation of the problem of identifying all error occurrences and all failed scan cells in at-speed scan based BIST environment. We propose a method that can be used to identify every error when the circuit test frequency is higher than the tester frequency. Our approach requires very little extra hardware for diagnosis and the test application time required to identify errors is a linear function of the frequency ratio between the CUT and the tester.