Measurements of contact discharge current waveforms from an ESD generator with a test voltage of 4kV are conducted with the IEC specified arrangement of a 2m long return current cable in different three calibration environments that all comply with the IEC calibration standard to identify the occurrence source of damped oscillations (ringing), which has remained unclear since contact discharge testing was first adopted in 1989 IEC publication 801-2. Their frequency spectra are analyzed comparing with the spectrum calculated from the ideal contact discharge current waveform without ringing (IEC specified waveform) offered in IEC 61000-4-2 and the spectra derived from a simplified equivalent circuit based on the IEC standard in combination with the measured input impedances of one-ended grounding return current cable with the same arrangement in the same calibration environment as those for the current measurements. The results show that the measured contact discharge waveforms have ringing around the IEC specified waveform after the falling edge of the peak, causing their spectra from 20MHz to 200MHz, but the spectra from 40MHz to 200MHz significantly differ depending on the calibration environments even for the same cable arrangement, which do not almost affect the spectra from 20MHz to 40MHz and over 200MHz. In the calibration environment under the cable arrangement close to the reference ground, the spectral shapes of the measured contact discharge currents and their frequencies of the multiple peaks and dips roughly correspond to the spectral distributions calculated from the simplified equivalent circuit using the measured cable input impedances. These findings reveal that the root cause of ringing is mainly due to the resonances of the return current cable, and calibration environment under the cable arrangement away from the reference ground tends to mitigate the cable resonances.

Electrostatic discharge (ESD) generators cause electromagnetic (EM) noises not only at ESD tests but also even before and after the tests. This may provide inconsistent test results, but the mechanism has not been well examined. To explain the mechanism qualitatively, we investigated a generation source model of EM noises from an ESD generator in conjunction with the functional control sequences of built-in relay switches and the DC high voltage power supply. To validate this model, we used a magnetic field probe to measure the induced EM noises before, during, and after contact and air discharges in accordance with the corresponding timing of the functional control sequences. As a result, we confirmed that the EM noises are induced when the relay switches operate before and at ESD testing and after ESD tests for both contact and air discharges. In addition, we found that the noise peaks due to contact discharges increase with charge voltages, and the peaks just before and at the testing are relatively larger than the ones after the tests, while the peaks of the induced noises at the air discharge testing do not always increase with charge voltages, but reach a maximum at 3kV. In addition, the peaks of the induced noises at the air discharge testing become smaller than either the peaks just before the testing and those after the tests at charge voltages above 6kV. This suggests that the EM noises just before ESD testing and after the test may cause the EUT to malfunction when air discharge tests with charge voltages over 6kV are conducted. A new control sequence of the built-in relay switch was also proposed for reducing the EM noises after ESD tests, which was validated through noise measurements.