In this letter, we propose a packet scheduling algorithm to support both real-time voice and video traffic for wireless multimedia data service in orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) system. Our design objective is to maximize the number of real-time service users that can be supported in the system subject to QoS requirement of packet loss rate (PLR). Both time slots and subcarriers are taken into account as the basic resource allocation unit in OFDMA/FDD system. The simulation results show that our proposed algorithm can dramatically increase the number of users satisfying the underlying QoS requirement for the real-time service, as compared to the existing algorithm.

In this paper, we comparatively evaluate two photonic packet switch architectures with WDM-FDL buffers for synchronized variable length packets. The first one is an output buffer type switch, which stores packets in the FDL buffer attached to each output port. Another is a shared buffer type switch, which stores packets in the shared FDL buffer. The performance of a switch is greatly influenced by its architecture and a packet scheduling algorithm. We compare the performances of these two packet switches by applying different packet scheduling algorithms. Through simulation experiments, we show that each architecture has a parameter region for achieving better performance. For the shared buffer type switch, we found that void space introduces unacceptable performance degradation when the traffic load is high. Accordingly, we propose a void space reduction method. Our simulation results show that our proposed method enables to the shared buffer type switch to outperform the output buffer type switch even under high traffic load conditions.

This paper studies effect of packet scheduling algorithms at routers on media synchronization quality in live audio and video transmission by experiment. In the experiment, we deal with four packet scheduling algorithms: First-In First-Out, Priority Queueing, Class-Based Queueing and Weighted Fair Queueing. We assess the synchronization quality of both intra-stream and inter-stream with and without media synchronization control. The paper clarifies the features of each algorithm from a media synchronization point of view. A comparison of the experimental results shows that Weighted Fair Queueing is the most efficient packet scheduling algorithm for continuous media among the four.

In this paper, an analytical model for evaluating the performance of a packet scheduling algorithm, called lookahead scheduling, is proposed. Using lookahead scheduling, each input port of a switch has B packet buffers. A packet arrives at an input port is scheduled for conflict-free transmission for up to B time slots in advance. If it cannot be scheduled for transmission in the next B slots, the packet is immediately dropped to prevent it from blocking the subsequently arrived packets. To evaluate this scheduling algorithm, we first construct a set of recursive equations for obtaining the buffer occupancy and the probability that a packet cannot be placed into a buffer. Based on that, analytical expressions for switch throughput, packet loss probability and mean packet delay are derived. Analytical results are then compared with the simulations and good agreement is found. A pipeline implementation of the lookahead scheduling is also proposed in this paper.

To implement the PGPS packet scheduling algorithm in high speed networks is more difficult since it is based on real time simulation of an equivalent fluid-model system leading to a higher implementation time complexity. A modified approach to PGPS is the SCFQ scheme. This scheme is easy to implement, but has an increasing end-to-end delay bound. The VC packet scheduling algorithm provides the same end-to-end delay bound as PGPS does, but has the disadvantage of unfairness. As SCFQ, SFQ is much easier to implement than PGPS and achieves the same fairness, but has a higher end-to-end delay bound than PGPS. We propose a new packet scheduling algorithm, called Minimum Starting-tag Fair Queueing (MSFQ), which assigns the virtual time to be the minimum starting tag over all backlogged connections. MSFQ is much easier to implement than PGPS and provides the same end-to-end delay bound for each connection and fairness as PGPS. In this paper, we will show the end-to-end delay bound and fairness of MSFQ and compare 5 rate-based packet scheduling algorithms including PGPS, VC, SCFQ, SFQ, and MSFQ focusing on end-to-end delay bound, fairness, and implementation time complexity.