In reliable multicast communications, retransmission control plays an important role from the viewpoint of scalability. Previous works show that the implosion of control packets, e.g. ACKs or NAKs, degrades the total performance of reliable multicast communications. Local recovery which enables receivers receiving a packet successfully to initiate recovering a lost packet may have the possibility to solve this scalability problem. This paper presents the performance evaluation of local recovery caused by grouping receiving nodes in reliable multicast communication. There seems to be many features dominating the performance of local recovery, the number of nodes in a group, the shared loss occurring simultaneously at multiple receivers and so on. When the number of receivers in a group increases, the geographical expansion of a group will degrade the delay performance of the receivers. In a configuration where most nodes in a local-recovery group suffer from shared loss, the failure of local recovery degrades the total performance. Our simulation results under a hierarchical network topology like the real Internet show that a local-recovery group configuration with two-adjacent MANs grouping performs well.
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Copy
Miki YAMAMOTO, Takashi HASHIMOTO, Hiromasa IKEDA, "Performance Evaluation of Local Recovery Group Configuration in Reliable Multicast" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications,
vol. E83-B, no. 12, pp. 2675-2684, December 2000, doi: .
Abstract: In reliable multicast communications, retransmission control plays an important role from the viewpoint of scalability. Previous works show that the implosion of control packets, e.g. ACKs or NAKs, degrades the total performance of reliable multicast communications. Local recovery which enables receivers receiving a packet successfully to initiate recovering a lost packet may have the possibility to solve this scalability problem. This paper presents the performance evaluation of local recovery caused by grouping receiving nodes in reliable multicast communication. There seems to be many features dominating the performance of local recovery, the number of nodes in a group, the shared loss occurring simultaneously at multiple receivers and so on. When the number of receivers in a group increases, the geographical expansion of a group will degrade the delay performance of the receivers. In a configuration where most nodes in a local-recovery group suffer from shared loss, the failure of local recovery degrades the total performance. Our simulation results under a hierarchical network topology like the real Internet show that a local-recovery group configuration with two-adjacent MANs grouping performs well.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/communications/10.1587/e83-b_12_2675/_p
Copy
@ARTICLE{e83-b_12_2675,
author={Miki YAMAMOTO, Takashi HASHIMOTO, Hiromasa IKEDA, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications},
title={Performance Evaluation of Local Recovery Group Configuration in Reliable Multicast},
year={2000},
volume={E83-B},
number={12},
pages={2675-2684},
abstract={In reliable multicast communications, retransmission control plays an important role from the viewpoint of scalability. Previous works show that the implosion of control packets, e.g. ACKs or NAKs, degrades the total performance of reliable multicast communications. Local recovery which enables receivers receiving a packet successfully to initiate recovering a lost packet may have the possibility to solve this scalability problem. This paper presents the performance evaluation of local recovery caused by grouping receiving nodes in reliable multicast communication. There seems to be many features dominating the performance of local recovery, the number of nodes in a group, the shared loss occurring simultaneously at multiple receivers and so on. When the number of receivers in a group increases, the geographical expansion of a group will degrade the delay performance of the receivers. In a configuration where most nodes in a local-recovery group suffer from shared loss, the failure of local recovery degrades the total performance. Our simulation results under a hierarchical network topology like the real Internet show that a local-recovery group configuration with two-adjacent MANs grouping performs well.},
keywords={},
doi={},
ISSN={},
month={December},}
Copy
TY - JOUR
TI - Performance Evaluation of Local Recovery Group Configuration in Reliable Multicast
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
SP - 2675
EP - 2684
AU - Miki YAMAMOTO
AU - Takashi HASHIMOTO
AU - Hiromasa IKEDA
PY - 2000
DO -
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
SN -
VL - E83-B
IS - 12
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
Y1 - December 2000
AB - In reliable multicast communications, retransmission control plays an important role from the viewpoint of scalability. Previous works show that the implosion of control packets, e.g. ACKs or NAKs, degrades the total performance of reliable multicast communications. Local recovery which enables receivers receiving a packet successfully to initiate recovering a lost packet may have the possibility to solve this scalability problem. This paper presents the performance evaluation of local recovery caused by grouping receiving nodes in reliable multicast communication. There seems to be many features dominating the performance of local recovery, the number of nodes in a group, the shared loss occurring simultaneously at multiple receivers and so on. When the number of receivers in a group increases, the geographical expansion of a group will degrade the delay performance of the receivers. In a configuration where most nodes in a local-recovery group suffer from shared loss, the failure of local recovery degrades the total performance. Our simulation results under a hierarchical network topology like the real Internet show that a local-recovery group configuration with two-adjacent MANs grouping performs well.
ER -