The high-end telecom terminal and PDAs, sometimes called Personal Trusted Devices (PTDs) are programmable, have tens of megabytes memory, and rather fast processors. In this paper we analyze, when it is energy-efficient to transfer application data compressed over the downlink and then decompress it at the terminal, or compress it first at the terminal and then send it compressed over up-link. These questions are meaningful in the context of usual application code or data and streams that are stored before presentation and require lossless compression methods to be used. We deduce an analytical model and assess the model parameters based on experiments in 2G (GSM) and 3G (FOMA) network. The results indicate that if the reduction through compression in size of the file to be downloaded is higher than ten per cent, energy is saved as compared to receiving the file uncompressed. For the upload case even two percent reduction in size is enough for energy savings at the terminal with the current transmission speeds and observed energy parameters. If time is saved using compressed files during transmission, then energy is certainly saved. From energy savings at the terminal we cannot deduce time savings, however. Energy and time consumed at the server for compression/decompression is considered negligible in this context and ignored. The same holds for the base stations and other fixed telecom infrastructure components.
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Copy
Jari VEIJALAINEN, Eetu OJANEN, Mohammad Aminul HAQ, Ville-Pekka VAHTEALA, Mitsuji MATSUMOTO, "Energy Consumption Tradeoffs for Compressed Wireless Data at a Mobile Terminal" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications,
vol. E87-B, no. 5, pp. 1123-1130, May 2004, doi: .
Abstract: The high-end telecom terminal and PDAs, sometimes called Personal Trusted Devices (PTDs) are programmable, have tens of megabytes memory, and rather fast processors. In this paper we analyze, when it is energy-efficient to transfer application data compressed over the downlink and then decompress it at the terminal, or compress it first at the terminal and then send it compressed over up-link. These questions are meaningful in the context of usual application code or data and streams that are stored before presentation and require lossless compression methods to be used. We deduce an analytical model and assess the model parameters based on experiments in 2G (GSM) and 3G (FOMA) network. The results indicate that if the reduction through compression in size of the file to be downloaded is higher than ten per cent, energy is saved as compared to receiving the file uncompressed. For the upload case even two percent reduction in size is enough for energy savings at the terminal with the current transmission speeds and observed energy parameters. If time is saved using compressed files during transmission, then energy is certainly saved. From energy savings at the terminal we cannot deduce time savings, however. Energy and time consumed at the server for compression/decompression is considered negligible in this context and ignored. The same holds for the base stations and other fixed telecom infrastructure components.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/communications/10.1587/e87-b_5_1123/_p
Copy
@ARTICLE{e87-b_5_1123,
author={Jari VEIJALAINEN, Eetu OJANEN, Mohammad Aminul HAQ, Ville-Pekka VAHTEALA, Mitsuji MATSUMOTO, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications},
title={Energy Consumption Tradeoffs for Compressed Wireless Data at a Mobile Terminal},
year={2004},
volume={E87-B},
number={5},
pages={1123-1130},
abstract={The high-end telecom terminal and PDAs, sometimes called Personal Trusted Devices (PTDs) are programmable, have tens of megabytes memory, and rather fast processors. In this paper we analyze, when it is energy-efficient to transfer application data compressed over the downlink and then decompress it at the terminal, or compress it first at the terminal and then send it compressed over up-link. These questions are meaningful in the context of usual application code or data and streams that are stored before presentation and require lossless compression methods to be used. We deduce an analytical model and assess the model parameters based on experiments in 2G (GSM) and 3G (FOMA) network. The results indicate that if the reduction through compression in size of the file to be downloaded is higher than ten per cent, energy is saved as compared to receiving the file uncompressed. For the upload case even two percent reduction in size is enough for energy savings at the terminal with the current transmission speeds and observed energy parameters. If time is saved using compressed files during transmission, then energy is certainly saved. From energy savings at the terminal we cannot deduce time savings, however. Energy and time consumed at the server for compression/decompression is considered negligible in this context and ignored. The same holds for the base stations and other fixed telecom infrastructure components.},
keywords={},
doi={},
ISSN={},
month={May},}
Copy
TY - JOUR
TI - Energy Consumption Tradeoffs for Compressed Wireless Data at a Mobile Terminal
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
SP - 1123
EP - 1130
AU - Jari VEIJALAINEN
AU - Eetu OJANEN
AU - Mohammad Aminul HAQ
AU - Ville-Pekka VAHTEALA
AU - Mitsuji MATSUMOTO
PY - 2004
DO -
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
SN -
VL - E87-B
IS - 5
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
Y1 - May 2004
AB - The high-end telecom terminal and PDAs, sometimes called Personal Trusted Devices (PTDs) are programmable, have tens of megabytes memory, and rather fast processors. In this paper we analyze, when it is energy-efficient to transfer application data compressed over the downlink and then decompress it at the terminal, or compress it first at the terminal and then send it compressed over up-link. These questions are meaningful in the context of usual application code or data and streams that are stored before presentation and require lossless compression methods to be used. We deduce an analytical model and assess the model parameters based on experiments in 2G (GSM) and 3G (FOMA) network. The results indicate that if the reduction through compression in size of the file to be downloaded is higher than ten per cent, energy is saved as compared to receiving the file uncompressed. For the upload case even two percent reduction in size is enough for energy savings at the terminal with the current transmission speeds and observed energy parameters. If time is saved using compressed files during transmission, then energy is certainly saved. From energy savings at the terminal we cannot deduce time savings, however. Energy and time consumed at the server for compression/decompression is considered negligible in this context and ignored. The same holds for the base stations and other fixed telecom infrastructure components.
ER -