IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals
A Study of Aspect Calculus
Summary :
Since Vendler classified aspect into four categories, state, achievement, activity, and accomplishment, much effort has been made to define the notion of aspect logically. It is commonly agreed that aspect represents the general temporal characteristics of events and states. However, there still remains a considerable amount of disagreement about its formal treatment. One of the major problems is that the aspect of a sentence shifts by certain types of sentence construction. For instance, adding time adverbials to a sentence modifies the original aspect, taking the progressive form of the verb changes the aspect, and so on. These phenomena are known as the aspect shifts. The other is the problem known as the imperfective paradox. The imperfective paradox is a problem of the truth definition of the progressives. The truth condition of the progressive form of the sentence is defined at an internal subinterval of the temporal range of the corresponding non-progressive sentence. If the truth condition of the progressive form of the sentence is defined using the truth condition of the non-progressive form of the sentence, there are logical contradictions of truth definition in a sentence such as "Max was building a house, but he never built it". These problems cause much confusion (1) in the truth definition of aspects, (2) in the definition of aspect operations, such as initiative, terminative, progressive, perfective, etc., and also (3) in the definition of adding time adverbials. This paper reviews the semantic problems with respect to aspect, and presents a consistent mechanism of aspect interpretation in order to settle all these semantic puzzles at once. For the sake of logical clarity, we construct a formal language, Lt, where every meaningful formula is a pair of a meaningful sentence and its aspect. The syntax of Lt describes the phenomenology of aspect shifts. The semantics of Lt defines temporal interpretation for all the meaningful sentences of Lt, with assuming the temporal interpretations of three inherent aspects, state, achievement, and activity. The proposed aspect interpretation gives a reasonable account for aspect shifts, and solves the imperfective paradox by asssuming the time structure to be backwards linear.
- Publication
- IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals Vol.E75-A No.3 pp.436-450
- Publication Date
- 1992/03/25
- Publicized
- Online ISSN
- DOI
- Type of Manuscript
- PAPER
- Category
- Foundations of Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Processing
Authors
Keyword
Latest Issue
Copyrights notice of machine-translated contents
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Cite this
Copy
Kazuo HASHIMOTO, Tohru ASAMI, Seiichi YAMAMOTO, "A Study of Aspect Calculus" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals,
vol. E75-A, no. 3, pp. 436-450, March 1992, doi: .
Abstract: Since Vendler classified aspect into four categories, state, achievement, activity, and accomplishment, much effort has been made to define the notion of aspect logically. It is commonly agreed that aspect represents the general temporal characteristics of events and states. However, there still remains a considerable amount of disagreement about its formal treatment. One of the major problems is that the aspect of a sentence shifts by certain types of sentence construction. For instance, adding time adverbials to a sentence modifies the original aspect, taking the progressive form of the verb changes the aspect, and so on. These phenomena are known as the aspect shifts. The other is the problem known as the imperfective paradox. The imperfective paradox is a problem of the truth definition of the progressives. The truth condition of the progressive form of the sentence is defined at an internal subinterval of the temporal range of the corresponding non-progressive sentence. If the truth condition of the progressive form of the sentence is defined using the truth condition of the non-progressive form of the sentence, there are logical contradictions of truth definition in a sentence such as "Max was building a house, but he never built it". These problems cause much confusion (1) in the truth definition of aspects, (2) in the definition of aspect operations, such as initiative, terminative, progressive, perfective, etc., and also (3) in the definition of adding time adverbials. This paper reviews the semantic problems with respect to aspect, and presents a consistent mechanism of aspect interpretation in order to settle all these semantic puzzles at once. For the sake of logical clarity, we construct a formal language, Lt, where every meaningful formula is a pair of a meaningful sentence and its aspect. The syntax of Lt describes the phenomenology of aspect shifts. The semantics of Lt defines temporal interpretation for all the meaningful sentences of Lt, with assuming the temporal interpretations of three inherent aspects, state, achievement, and activity. The proposed aspect interpretation gives a reasonable account for aspect shifts, and solves the imperfective paradox by asssuming the time structure to be backwards linear.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/fundamentals/10.1587/e75-a_3_436/_p
Copy
@ARTICLE{e75-a_3_436,
author={Kazuo HASHIMOTO, Tohru ASAMI, Seiichi YAMAMOTO, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals},
title={A Study of Aspect Calculus},
year={1992},
volume={E75-A},
number={3},
pages={436-450},
abstract={Since Vendler classified aspect into four categories, state, achievement, activity, and accomplishment, much effort has been made to define the notion of aspect logically. It is commonly agreed that aspect represents the general temporal characteristics of events and states. However, there still remains a considerable amount of disagreement about its formal treatment. One of the major problems is that the aspect of a sentence shifts by certain types of sentence construction. For instance, adding time adverbials to a sentence modifies the original aspect, taking the progressive form of the verb changes the aspect, and so on. These phenomena are known as the aspect shifts. The other is the problem known as the imperfective paradox. The imperfective paradox is a problem of the truth definition of the progressives. The truth condition of the progressive form of the sentence is defined at an internal subinterval of the temporal range of the corresponding non-progressive sentence. If the truth condition of the progressive form of the sentence is defined using the truth condition of the non-progressive form of the sentence, there are logical contradictions of truth definition in a sentence such as "Max was building a house, but he never built it". These problems cause much confusion (1) in the truth definition of aspects, (2) in the definition of aspect operations, such as initiative, terminative, progressive, perfective, etc., and also (3) in the definition of adding time adverbials. This paper reviews the semantic problems with respect to aspect, and presents a consistent mechanism of aspect interpretation in order to settle all these semantic puzzles at once. For the sake of logical clarity, we construct a formal language, Lt, where every meaningful formula is a pair of a meaningful sentence and its aspect. The syntax of Lt describes the phenomenology of aspect shifts. The semantics of Lt defines temporal interpretation for all the meaningful sentences of Lt, with assuming the temporal interpretations of three inherent aspects, state, achievement, and activity. The proposed aspect interpretation gives a reasonable account for aspect shifts, and solves the imperfective paradox by asssuming the time structure to be backwards linear.},
keywords={},
doi={},
ISSN={},
month={March},}
Copy
TY - JOUR
TI - A Study of Aspect Calculus
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals
SP - 436
EP - 450
AU - Kazuo HASHIMOTO
AU - Tohru ASAMI
AU - Seiichi YAMAMOTO
PY - 1992
DO -
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals
SN -
VL - E75-A
IS - 3
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals
Y1 - March 1992
AB - Since Vendler classified aspect into four categories, state, achievement, activity, and accomplishment, much effort has been made to define the notion of aspect logically. It is commonly agreed that aspect represents the general temporal characteristics of events and states. However, there still remains a considerable amount of disagreement about its formal treatment. One of the major problems is that the aspect of a sentence shifts by certain types of sentence construction. For instance, adding time adverbials to a sentence modifies the original aspect, taking the progressive form of the verb changes the aspect, and so on. These phenomena are known as the aspect shifts. The other is the problem known as the imperfective paradox. The imperfective paradox is a problem of the truth definition of the progressives. The truth condition of the progressive form of the sentence is defined at an internal subinterval of the temporal range of the corresponding non-progressive sentence. If the truth condition of the progressive form of the sentence is defined using the truth condition of the non-progressive form of the sentence, there are logical contradictions of truth definition in a sentence such as "Max was building a house, but he never built it". These problems cause much confusion (1) in the truth definition of aspects, (2) in the definition of aspect operations, such as initiative, terminative, progressive, perfective, etc., and also (3) in the definition of adding time adverbials. This paper reviews the semantic problems with respect to aspect, and presents a consistent mechanism of aspect interpretation in order to settle all these semantic puzzles at once. For the sake of logical clarity, we construct a formal language, Lt, where every meaningful formula is a pair of a meaningful sentence and its aspect. The syntax of Lt describes the phenomenology of aspect shifts. The semantics of Lt defines temporal interpretation for all the meaningful sentences of Lt, with assuming the temporal interpretations of three inherent aspects, state, achievement, and activity. The proposed aspect interpretation gives a reasonable account for aspect shifts, and solves the imperfective paradox by asssuming the time structure to be backwards linear.
ER -
English
