In real life, our sence of social reality is supported by the institutional basis, group/interpersonal basis, and belief/schema basis. In networked life, in contrast, these natural and ordinary bases are not always warranted because of a lack of institutional backup, the fragility of the group or interpersonal environment, and the noncommonality of our common sense. In order to compensate for these incomplete bases, networkers ar seeking adaptive communication styles. In this process, there emerge three types of communication cultures. One is the
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Copy
Ken'ichi IKEDA, "A Social Psychological Approach to Networked" Reality" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information,
vol. E77-D, no. 12, pp. 1390-1396, December 1994, doi: .
Abstract: In real life, our sence of social reality is supported by the institutional basis, group/interpersonal basis, and belief/schema basis. In networked life, in contrast, these natural and ordinary bases are not always warranted because of a lack of institutional backup, the fragility of the group or interpersonal environment, and the noncommonality of our common sense. In order to compensate for these incomplete bases, networkers ar seeking adaptive communication styles. In this process, there emerge three types of communication cultures. One is the
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/information/10.1587/e77-d_12_1390/_p
Copy
@ARTICLE{e77-d_12_1390,
author={Ken'ichi IKEDA, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information},
title={A Social Psychological Approach to Networked" Reality},
year={1994},
volume={E77-D},
number={12},
pages={1390-1396},
abstract={In real life, our sence of social reality is supported by the institutional basis, group/interpersonal basis, and belief/schema basis. In networked life, in contrast, these natural and ordinary bases are not always warranted because of a lack of institutional backup, the fragility of the group or interpersonal environment, and the noncommonality of our common sense. In order to compensate for these incomplete bases, networkers ar seeking adaptive communication styles. In this process, there emerge three types of communication cultures. One is the
keywords={},
doi={},
ISSN={},
month={December},}
Copy
TY - JOUR
TI - A Social Psychological Approach to Networked" Reality
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
SP - 1390
EP - 1396
AU - Ken'ichi IKEDA
PY - 1994
DO -
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
SN -
VL - E77-D
IS - 12
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
Y1 - December 1994
AB - In real life, our sence of social reality is supported by the institutional basis, group/interpersonal basis, and belief/schema basis. In networked life, in contrast, these natural and ordinary bases are not always warranted because of a lack of institutional backup, the fragility of the group or interpersonal environment, and the noncommonality of our common sense. In order to compensate for these incomplete bases, networkers ar seeking adaptive communication styles. In this process, there emerge three types of communication cultures. One is the
ER -