A spectrum-based fault localization technique (SBFL), which identifies fault location(s) in a buggy program by comparing the execution statistics of the program spectra of passed executions and failed executions, is a popular automatic debugging technique. However, the usefulness of SBFL is mainly affected by the following two factors: accuracy and fault understanding in reality. To solve this issue, we propose a SBFL framework to support fault understanding. In the framework, we firstly localize a suspicious fault module to start debugging and then generate a weighted fault propagation graph (WFPG) for the hypothesis fault module, which weights the suspiciousness for the nodes to further perform block-level fault localization. In order to evaluate the proposed framework, we conduct a controlled experiment to compare two different module-level SBFL approaches and validate the effectiveness of WFPG. According to our preliminary experiments, the results are promising.

Software fault localization, as one of the essential activities in program debugging, aids to software developers to identify the locations of faults in a program, thus reducing the cost of program debugging. Spectrum-based fault localization (SBFL), as one of the representative localization techniques, has been intensively studied. The localization technique calculates the probability of each program entity that is faulty by a certain suspiciousness formula. The accuracy of SBFL is not always as satisfactory as expected because it neglects the contextual information of statement executions. Therefore, we proposed 5 rules, i.e., random, the maximum coverage, the minimum coverage, the maximum distance, and the minimum distance, to improve the accuracy of SBFL for further. The 5 rules can effectively use the contextual information of statement executions. Moreover, they can be implemented on the traditional SBFL techniques using suspiciousness formulas with little effort. We empirically evaluated the impacts of the rules on 17 suspiciousness formulas. The results show that all 5 rules can significantly improve the ranking of faulty statements. Particularly, for the faults difficult to locate, the improvement is more remarkable. Generally, the rules can effectively reduce the number of statements examined by an average of more than 19%. Compared with other rules, the minimum coverage rule generates better results. This indicates that the application of the test case having the minimum coverage capability for fault localization is more effective.

Class imbalance has drawn much attention of researchers in software defect prediction. In practice, the performance of defect prediction models may be affected by the class imbalance problem. In this paper, we present an approach to evaluating the performance stability of defect prediction models on imbalanced datasets. First, random sampling is applied to convert the original imbalanced dataset into a set of new datasets with different levels of imbalance ratio. Second, typical prediction models are selected to make predictions on these new constructed datasets, and Coefficient of Variation (C·V) is used to evaluate the performance stability of different models. Finally, an empirical study is designed to evaluate the performance stability of six prediction models, which are widely used in software defect prediction. The results show that the performance of C4.5 is unstable on imbalanced datasets, and the performance of Naive Bayes and Random Forest are more stable than other models.

Heterogeneous defect prediction (HDP) is to detect the largest number of defective software modules in one project by using historical data collected from other projects with different metrics. However, these data can not be directly used because of different metrics set among projects. Meanwhile, software data have more non-defective instances than defective instances which may cause a significant bias towards defective instances. To completely solve these two restrictions, we propose unsupervised deep domain adaptation approach to build a HDP model. Specifically, we firstly map the data of source and target projects into a unified metric representation (UMR). Then, we design a simple neural network (SNN) model to deal with the heterogeneous and class-imbalanced problems in software defect prediction (SDP). In particular, our model introduces the Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) as the distance between the source and target data to reduce the distribution mismatch, and use the cross-entropy loss function as the classification loss. Extensive experiments on 18 public projects from four datasets indicate that the proposed approach can build an effective prediction model for heterogeneous defect prediction (HDP) and outperforms the related competing approaches.

Memory leak occurs when useless objects cannot be released for a long time during program execution. Memory leaked objects may cause memory overflow, system performance degradation and even cause the system to crash when they become serious. This paper presents a dynamic approach for detecting and measuring memory leaked objects in Java programs. First, our approach tracks the program by JDI and records heap information to find out the potentially leaked objects. Second, we present memory leaking confidence to measure the influence of these objects on the program. Finally, we select three open-source programs to evaluate the efficiency of our approach. Furthermore, we choose ten programs from DaCapo 9.12 benchmark suite to reveal the time overhead of our approach. The experimental results show that our approach is able to detect and measure memory leaked objects efficiently.

Spectrum-based fault localization (SFL) is a lightweight approach, which aims at helping debuggers to identity root causes of failures by measuring suspiciousness for each program component being a fault, and generate a hypothetical fault ranking list. Although SFL techniques have been shown to be effective, the fault component in a buggy program cannot always be ranked at the top due to its complex fault triggering models. However, it is extremely difficult to model the complex triggering models for all buggy programs. To solve this issue, we propose two simple fault triggering models (RIPRα and RIPRβ), and a refinement technique to improve fault absolute ranking based on the two fault triggering models, through ruling out some higher ranked components according to its fault triggering model. Intuitively, our approach is effective if a fault component was ranked within top k in the two fault ranking lists outputted by the two fault localization strategies. Experimental results show that our approach can significantly improve the fault absolute ranking in the three cases.