In this paper, a new two-level flow control scheme using VP credit-based control and stop-and-go rate control for Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) networks is presented. Since the proposed scheme does not require any information on traffic characteristics, we propose to apply such a flow control scheme to the best effort traffic that requires no band-width guarantee from the network. The proposed flow control scheme can efficiently use the leftover bandwidth after the guaranteed traffic has been satisfied. Therefore, high bandwidth utilization can be achieved. Furthermore, cell loss can completely be avoided by the lower-level credit-flow control done on a per VP basis. On top of this, a higher-level Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) rate control is employed to avoid any performance degradation. Simulations have been performed to verify the effectiveness of the proposed scheme. It is found that the average end-to-end delay of our proposed scheme is better than that of the original VCFC scheme [1]. In addition, there is also a tremendous saving in the memory required when compared with the VCFC scheme.

In this paper, we study a dynamic bandwidth control which is expected an effective use of network resources in transmitting highly bursty traffic generated by, e.g., interconnected LAN systems. First, a new LAN traffic model is proposed in which correlation of not only packet interarrival times but also packet lengths are considered. An analytic model for a LAN-ATM gateway is next introduced. It employs the dynamic bandwidth control using the proposed LAN traffic model and some performance measures are derived by it. The analytic model takes into account the probability that a bandwidth increase request may be rejected. Finally, some numerical examples are provided using the analysis method and performance comparisons between the dynamic and fixed bandwidth controls are made. As a result, it is quantitatively indicated that () if the equivalent bandwidth is used in average, the dynamic bandwidth control keeps packet and cell loss rates one to two orders lower than the fixed bandwidth control, () when the more strict QOS in terms of loss rate is requested, the dynamic bandwidth control can become more effective.