The search functionality is under construction.
The search functionality is under construction.

Keyword Search Result

[Keyword] distributed configuration(2hit)

1-2hit
  • A 15-50 GHz-Band GaAs MMIC Variable Attenuator with 20-dB Attenuation Control

    Kazuya NISHIHORI  Shigeru WATANABE  Fumio SASAKI  Kazuhiro ARAI  

     
    PAPER

      Vol:
    E84-C No:10
      Page(s):
    1543-1547

    A 15-50 GHz-band GaAs MMIC variable attenuator has been developed for microwave and millimeter-wave wireless communications systems. The attenuator employs a balanced distributed configuration using shunt connected HEMT's in order to realize a broadband operation, a low insertion loss and a good impedance matching with simple control bias scheme. The MMIC was fabricated with a pseudomorphic HEMT device technology. It has exhibited an insertion loss as low as 1.6 dB with an attenuation control range as wide as 21 dB at 26 GHz. It has also shown a good linearity of an input power of more than 12 dBm at 1-dB compression point and that of 26.3 dBm at a 3rd-order intercept point.

  • Implementation of SS No. 7 Functions in a Large-Capacity Switching Node with Distributed Configuration

    Etsuo MASUDA  Hideo SHIMBO  Katsuyuki KAWASE  Masanori HIRANO  

     
    PAPER-Switching

      Vol:
    E83-B No:12
      Page(s):
    2635-2647

    Methods for implementing SS7 functions are proposed for a large-capacity decentralized switching node; they satisfy the condition of hiding distributed configurations from adjacent nodes. First, line accommodation and acquisition methods are clarified for a large-capacity switching node in which multiple modules are used to realize trunk circuits and SS7 signaling links. Two methods are then proposed for allocating SS7 functions within the switching node. One distributes the functions over multiple circuit-switched modules (distributed allocation) while the other centralizes the functions in dedicated signaling modules (centralized allocation). We quantitatively evaluate both methods in terms of node scale versus the number of modules and signaling links required, the inter-module data transfer rate required, and the node traffic handling capacity when a particular module fails. From the evaluation results, we show that the distributed allocation should be employed for small-scale nodes and the centralized allocation for large-scale nodes. We also show the effectiveness of a method for avoiding a characteristic problem that arises when a particular module fails. Finally, we implement an experimental system as an example.