This paper discusses performance prediction of clock generation PLLs using a ring oscillator based VCO (RingVCO) and an LC oscillator based VCO (LCVCO). For clock generation, we generally design PLLs using RingVCOs because of their superiority in tunable frequency range, chip area and power consumption, in spite of their poor noise characteristics. In the future, it is predicted that operating frequency will rapidly increase and supply voltage will dramatically decrease. Besides, rigid noise performances will be required. In this condition, it is not clear neither how performances of both PLLs will change nor the performance differences between both PLLs will change. This paper predicts and compares future performances of PLLs using a RingVCO and an LCVCO with a qualitative evaluation by an analytical approach and with design experiments based on predicted process parameters. Our discussion reveals that the relative performance difference between both PLLs will be unchanged. As technology advances, power dissipation and chip area of both PLLs favorably decrease, while, noise characteristics of both PLLs degrade, which indicates low noise PLL circuit design will be more important.
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Copy
Takahito MIYAZAKI, Masanori HASHIMOTO, Hidetoshi ONODERA, "A Performance Prediction of Clock Generation PLLs: A Ring Oscillator Based PLL and an LC Oscillator Based PLL" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Electronics,
vol. E88-C, no. 3, pp. 437-444, March 2005, doi: 10.1093/ietele/e88-c.3.437.
Abstract: This paper discusses performance prediction of clock generation PLLs using a ring oscillator based VCO (RingVCO) and an LC oscillator based VCO (LCVCO). For clock generation, we generally design PLLs using RingVCOs because of their superiority in tunable frequency range, chip area and power consumption, in spite of their poor noise characteristics. In the future, it is predicted that operating frequency will rapidly increase and supply voltage will dramatically decrease. Besides, rigid noise performances will be required. In this condition, it is not clear neither how performances of both PLLs will change nor the performance differences between both PLLs will change. This paper predicts and compares future performances of PLLs using a RingVCO and an LCVCO with a qualitative evaluation by an analytical approach and with design experiments based on predicted process parameters. Our discussion reveals that the relative performance difference between both PLLs will be unchanged. As technology advances, power dissipation and chip area of both PLLs favorably decrease, while, noise characteristics of both PLLs degrade, which indicates low noise PLL circuit design will be more important.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/electronics/10.1093/ietele/e88-c.3.437/_p
Copy
@ARTICLE{e88-c_3_437,
author={Takahito MIYAZAKI, Masanori HASHIMOTO, Hidetoshi ONODERA, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Electronics},
title={A Performance Prediction of Clock Generation PLLs: A Ring Oscillator Based PLL and an LC Oscillator Based PLL},
year={2005},
volume={E88-C},
number={3},
pages={437-444},
abstract={This paper discusses performance prediction of clock generation PLLs using a ring oscillator based VCO (RingVCO) and an LC oscillator based VCO (LCVCO). For clock generation, we generally design PLLs using RingVCOs because of their superiority in tunable frequency range, chip area and power consumption, in spite of their poor noise characteristics. In the future, it is predicted that operating frequency will rapidly increase and supply voltage will dramatically decrease. Besides, rigid noise performances will be required. In this condition, it is not clear neither how performances of both PLLs will change nor the performance differences between both PLLs will change. This paper predicts and compares future performances of PLLs using a RingVCO and an LCVCO with a qualitative evaluation by an analytical approach and with design experiments based on predicted process parameters. Our discussion reveals that the relative performance difference between both PLLs will be unchanged. As technology advances, power dissipation and chip area of both PLLs favorably decrease, while, noise characteristics of both PLLs degrade, which indicates low noise PLL circuit design will be more important.},
keywords={},
doi={10.1093/ietele/e88-c.3.437},
ISSN={},
month={March},}
Copy
TY - JOUR
TI - A Performance Prediction of Clock Generation PLLs: A Ring Oscillator Based PLL and an LC Oscillator Based PLL
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Electronics
SP - 437
EP - 444
AU - Takahito MIYAZAKI
AU - Masanori HASHIMOTO
AU - Hidetoshi ONODERA
PY - 2005
DO - 10.1093/ietele/e88-c.3.437
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Electronics
SN -
VL - E88-C
IS - 3
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Electronics
Y1 - March 2005
AB - This paper discusses performance prediction of clock generation PLLs using a ring oscillator based VCO (RingVCO) and an LC oscillator based VCO (LCVCO). For clock generation, we generally design PLLs using RingVCOs because of their superiority in tunable frequency range, chip area and power consumption, in spite of their poor noise characteristics. In the future, it is predicted that operating frequency will rapidly increase and supply voltage will dramatically decrease. Besides, rigid noise performances will be required. In this condition, it is not clear neither how performances of both PLLs will change nor the performance differences between both PLLs will change. This paper predicts and compares future performances of PLLs using a RingVCO and an LCVCO with a qualitative evaluation by an analytical approach and with design experiments based on predicted process parameters. Our discussion reveals that the relative performance difference between both PLLs will be unchanged. As technology advances, power dissipation and chip area of both PLLs favorably decrease, while, noise characteristics of both PLLs degrade, which indicates low noise PLL circuit design will be more important.
ER -