The search functionality is under construction.

Keyword Search Result

[Keyword] hardware trojans(4hit)

1-4hit
  • A Multiobjective Approach for Side-Channel Based Hardware Trojan Detection Using Power Traces Open Access

    Priyadharshini MOHANRAJ  Saravanan PARAMASIVAM  

     
    PAPER-Cryptography and Information Security

      Pubricized:
    2023/08/23
      Vol:
    E107-A No:5
      Page(s):
    825-835

    The detection of hardware trojans has been extensively studied in the past. In this article, we propose a side-channel analysis technique that uses a wrapper-based feature selection technique for hardware trojan detection. The whale optimization algorithm is modified to carefully extract the best feature subset. The aim of the proposed technique is multiobjective: improve the accuracy and minimize the number of features. The power consumption traces measured from AES-128 trojan circuits are used as features in this experiment. The stabilizing property of the feature selection method helps to bring a mutual trade-off between the precision and recall parameters thereby minimizing the number of false negatives. The proposed hardware trojan detection scheme produces a maximum of 10.3% improvement in accuracy and reduction up to a single feature by employing the modified whale optimization technique. Thus the evaluation results conducted on various trust-hub cryptographic benchmark circuits prove to be efficient from the existing state-of-art methods.

  • Hardware Trojan Detection and Classification Based on Logic Testing Utilizing Steady State Learning

    Masaru OYA  Masao YANAGISAWA  Nozomu TOGAWA  

     
    PAPER

      Vol:
    E101-A No:12
      Page(s):
    2308-2319

    Modern digital integrated circuits (ICs) are often designed and fabricated by third parties and tools, which can make IC design/fabrication vulnerable to malicious modifications. The malicious circuits are generally referred to as hardware Trojans (HTs) and they are considered to be a serious security concern. In this paper, we propose a logic-testing based HT detection and classification method utilizing steady state learning. We first observe that HTs are hidden while applying random test patterns in a short time but most of them can be activated in a very long-term random circuit operation. Hence it is very natural that we learn steady signal-transition states of every suspicious Trojan net in a netlist by performing short-term random simulation. After that, we simulate or emulate the netlist in a very long time by giving random test patterns and obtain a set of signal-transition states. By discovering correlation between them, our method detects HTs and finds out its behavior. HTs sometimes do not affect primary outputs but just leak information over side channels. Our method can be successfully applied to those types of HTs. Experimental results demonstrate that our method can successfully identify all the real Trojan nets to be Trojan nets and all the normal nets to be normal nets, while other existing logic-testing HT detection methods cannot detect some of them. Moreover, our method can successfully detect HTs even if they are not really activated during long-term random simulation. Our method also correctly guesses the HT behavior utilizing signal transition learning.

  • Hardware-Trojans Rank: Quantitative Evaluation of Security Threats at Gate-Level Netlists by Pattern Matching

    Masaru OYA  Noritaka YAMASHITA  Toshihiko OKAMURA  Yukiyasu TSUNOO  Masao YANAGISAWA  Nozomu TOGAWA  

     
    PAPER

      Vol:
    E99-A No:12
      Page(s):
    2335-2347

    Since digital ICs are often designed and fabricated by third parties at any phases today, we must eliminate risks that malicious attackers may implement Hardware Trojans (HTs) on them. In particular, they can easily insert HTs during design phase. This paper proposes an HT rank which is a new quantitative analysis criterion against HTs at gate-level netlists. We have carefully analyzed all the gate-level netlists in Trust-HUB benchmark suite and found out several Trojan net features in them. Then we design the three types of Trojan points: feature point, count point, and location point. By assigning these points to every net and summing up them, we have the maximum Trojan point in a gate-level netlist. This point gives our HT rank. The HT rank can be calculated just by net features and we do not perform any logic simulation nor random test. When all the gate-level netlists in Trust-HUB, ISCAS85, ISCAS89 and ITC99 benchmark suites as well as several OpenCores designs, HT-free and HT-inserted AES netlists are ranked by our HT rank, we can completely distinguish HT-inserted ones (which HT rank is ten or more) from HT-free ones (which HT rank is nine or less). The HT rank is the world-first quantitative criterion which distinguishes HT-inserted netlists from HT-free ones in all the gate-level netlists in Trust-HUB, ISCAS85, ISCAS89, and ITC99.

  • A Hardware-Trojans Identifying Method Based on Trojan Net Scoring at Gate-Level Netlists

    Masaru OYA  Youhua SHI  Noritaka YAMASHITA  Toshihiko OKAMURA  Yukiyasu TSUNOO  Satoshi GOTO  Masao YANAGISAWA  Nozomu TOGAWA  

     
    PAPER-Logic Synthesis, Test and Verification

      Vol:
    E98-A No:12
      Page(s):
    2537-2546

    Outsourcing IC design and fabrication is one of the effective solutions to reduce design cost but it may cause severe security risks. Particularly, malicious outside vendors may implement Hardware Trojans (HTs) on ICs. When we focus on IC design phase, we cannot assume an HT-free netlist or a Golden netlist and it is too difficult to identify whether a given netlist is HT-free or not. In this paper, we propose a score-based hardware-trojans identifying method at gate-level netlists without using a Golden netlist. Our proposed method does not directly detect HTs themselves in a gate-level netlist but it detects a net included in HTs, which is called Trojan net, instead. Firstly, we observe Trojan nets from several HT-inserted benchmarks and extract several their features. Secondly, we give scores to extracted Trojan net features and sum up them for each net in benchmarks. Then we can find out a score threshold to classify HT-free and HT-inserted netlists. Based on these scores, we can successfully classify HT-free and HT-inserted netlists in all the Trust-HUB gate-level benchmarks and ISCAS85 benchmarks as well as HT-free and HT-inserted AES gate-level netlists. Experimental results demonstrate that our method successfully identify all the HT-inserted gate-level benchmarks to be “HT-inserted” and all the HT-free gate-level benchmarks to be “HT-free” in approximately three hours for each benchmark.