The search functionality is under construction.
The search functionality is under construction.

Keyword Search Result

[Keyword] subjective quality assessment(3hit)

1-3hit
  • Performance Comparison of Subjective Quality Assessment Methods for 4k Video

    Kimiko KAWASHIMA  Kazuhisa YAMAGISHI  Takanori HAYASHI  

     
    PAPER-Multimedia Systems for Communications

      Pubricized:
    2017/08/29
      Vol:
    E101-B No:3
      Page(s):
    933-945

    Many subjective quality assessment methods have been standardized. Experimenters can select a method from these methods in accordance with the aim of the planned subjective assessment experiment. It is often argued that the results of subjective quality assessment are affected by range effects that are caused by the quality distribution of the assessment videos. However, there are no studies on the double stimulus continuous quality-scale (DSCQS) and absolute category rating with hidden reference (ACR-HR) methods that investigate range effects in the high-quality range. Therefore, we conduct experiments using high-quality assessment videos (high-quality experiment) and low-to-high-quality assessment videos (low-to-high-quality experiment) and compare the DSCQS and ACR-HR methods in terms of accuracy, stability, and discrimination ability. Regarding accuracy, we find that the mean opinion scores of the DSCQS and ACR-HR methods were marginally affected by range effects, although almost all common processed video sequences showed no significant difference for the high- and low-to-high-quality experiments. Second, the DSCQS and ACR-HR methods were equally stable in the low-to-high-quality experiment, whereas the DSCQS method was more stable than the ACR-HR method in the high-quality experiment. Finally, the DSCQS method had higher discrimination ability than the ACR-HR method in the low-to-high-quality experiment, whereas both methods had almost the same discrimination ability for the high-quality experiment. We thus determined that the DSCQS method is better at minimizing the range effects than the ACR-HR method in the high-quality range.

  • Web-Browsing QoE Estimation Model

    Toshiko TOMINAGA  Kanako SATO  Noriko YOSHIMURA  Masataka MASUDA  Hitoshi AOKI  Takanori HAYASHI  

     
    PAPER-Network

      Pubricized:
    2017/03/29
      Vol:
    E100-B No:10
      Page(s):
    1837-1845

    Web browsing services are expanding as smartphones are becoming increasingly popular worldwide. To provide customers with appropriate quality of web-browsing services, quality design and in-service quality management on the basis of quality of experience (QoE) is important. We propose a web-browsing QoE estimation model. The most important QoE factor for web-browsing is the waiting time for a web page to load. Next, the variation in the communication quality based on a mobile network should be considered. We developed a subjective quality assessment test to clarify QoE characteristics in terms of waiting time using 20 different types of web pages and constructed a web-page QoE estimation model. We then conducted a subjective quality assessment test of web-browsing to clarify the relationship between web-page QoE and web-browsing QoE for three web sites. We obtained the following two QoE characteristics. First, the main factor influencing web-browsing QoE is the average web-page QoE. Second, when web-page QoE variation occurs, a decrease in web-page QoE with a huge amplitude causes the web-browsing QoE to decrease. We used these characteristics in constructing our web-browsing QoE estimation model. The verification test results using non-training data indicate the accuracy of the model. We also show that our findings are applicable to web-browsing quality design and solving management issues on the basis of QoE.

  • Image and Video Quality Assessment Using LCD: Comparisons with CRT Conditions

    Sylvain TOURANCHEAU  Patrick LE CALLET  Dominique BARBA  

     
    INVITED PAPER

      Vol:
    E91-A No:6
      Page(s):
    1383-1391

    In this paper, the impact of display on quality assessment is addressed. Subjective quality assessment experiments have been performed on both LCD and CRT displays. Two sets of still images and two sets of moving pictures have been assessed using either an ACR or a SAMVIQ protocol. Altogether, eight experiments have been led. Results are presented and discussed, some differences are pointed out. Concerning moving pictures, these differences seem to be mainly due to LCD moving artefacts such as motion blur. LCD motion blur has been measured objectively and with psycho-physics experiments. A motion-blur metric based on the temporal characteristics of LCD can be defined. A prediction model have been then designed which predict the differences of perceived quality between CRT and LCD. This motion-blur-based model enables the estimation of perceived quality on LCD with respect to the perceived quality on CRT. Technical solutions to LCD motion blur can thus be evaluated on natural contents by this mean.