Image and Video Quality Assessment Using LCD: Comparisons with CRT Conditions
Summary :
In this paper, the impact of display on quality assessment is addressed. Subjective quality assessment experiments have been performed on both LCD and CRT displays. Two sets of still images and two sets of moving pictures have been assessed using either an ACR or a SAMVIQ protocol. Altogether, eight experiments have been led. Results are presented and discussed, some differences are pointed out. Concerning moving pictures, these differences seem to be mainly due to LCD moving artefacts such as motion blur. LCD motion blur has been measured objectively and with psycho-physics experiments. A motion-blur metric based on the temporal characteristics of LCD can be defined. A prediction model have been then designed which predict the differences of perceived quality between CRT and LCD. This motion-blur-based model enables the estimation of perceived quality on LCD with respect to the perceived quality on CRT. Technical solutions to LCD motion blur can thus be evaluated on natural contents by this mean.
- Publication
- IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals Vol.E91-A No.6 pp.1383-1391
- Publication Date
- 2008/06/01
- Publicized
- Online ISSN
- 1745-1337
- DOI
- 10.1093/ietfec/e91-a.6.1383
- Type of Manuscript
- Special Section INVITED PAPER (Special Section on Image Media Quality)
- Category
Authors
Keyword
Latest Issue
Copyrights notice of machine-translated contents
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Cite this
Copy
Sylvain TOURANCHEAU, Patrick LE CALLET, Dominique BARBA, "Image and Video Quality Assessment Using LCD: Comparisons with CRT Conditions" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals,
vol. E91-A, no. 6, pp. 1383-1391, June 2008, doi: 10.1093/ietfec/e91-a.6.1383.
Abstract: In this paper, the impact of display on quality assessment is addressed. Subjective quality assessment experiments have been performed on both LCD and CRT displays. Two sets of still images and two sets of moving pictures have been assessed using either an ACR or a SAMVIQ protocol. Altogether, eight experiments have been led. Results are presented and discussed, some differences are pointed out. Concerning moving pictures, these differences seem to be mainly due to LCD moving artefacts such as motion blur. LCD motion blur has been measured objectively and with psycho-physics experiments. A motion-blur metric based on the temporal characteristics of LCD can be defined. A prediction model have been then designed which predict the differences of perceived quality between CRT and LCD. This motion-blur-based model enables the estimation of perceived quality on LCD with respect to the perceived quality on CRT. Technical solutions to LCD motion blur can thus be evaluated on natural contents by this mean.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/fundamentals/10.1093/ietfec/e91-a.6.1383/_p
Copy
@ARTICLE{e91-a_6_1383,
author={Sylvain TOURANCHEAU, Patrick LE CALLET, Dominique BARBA, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals},
title={Image and Video Quality Assessment Using LCD: Comparisons with CRT Conditions},
year={2008},
volume={E91-A},
number={6},
pages={1383-1391},
abstract={In this paper, the impact of display on quality assessment is addressed. Subjective quality assessment experiments have been performed on both LCD and CRT displays. Two sets of still images and two sets of moving pictures have been assessed using either an ACR or a SAMVIQ protocol. Altogether, eight experiments have been led. Results are presented and discussed, some differences are pointed out. Concerning moving pictures, these differences seem to be mainly due to LCD moving artefacts such as motion blur. LCD motion blur has been measured objectively and with psycho-physics experiments. A motion-blur metric based on the temporal characteristics of LCD can be defined. A prediction model have been then designed which predict the differences of perceived quality between CRT and LCD. This motion-blur-based model enables the estimation of perceived quality on LCD with respect to the perceived quality on CRT. Technical solutions to LCD motion blur can thus be evaluated on natural contents by this mean.},
keywords={},
doi={10.1093/ietfec/e91-a.6.1383},
ISSN={1745-1337},
month={June},}
Copy
TY - JOUR
TI - Image and Video Quality Assessment Using LCD: Comparisons with CRT Conditions
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals
SP - 1383
EP - 1391
AU - Sylvain TOURANCHEAU
AU - Patrick LE CALLET
AU - Dominique BARBA
PY - 2008
DO - 10.1093/ietfec/e91-a.6.1383
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals
SN - 1745-1337
VL - E91-A
IS - 6
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals
Y1 - June 2008
AB - In this paper, the impact of display on quality assessment is addressed. Subjective quality assessment experiments have been performed on both LCD and CRT displays. Two sets of still images and two sets of moving pictures have been assessed using either an ACR or a SAMVIQ protocol. Altogether, eight experiments have been led. Results are presented and discussed, some differences are pointed out. Concerning moving pictures, these differences seem to be mainly due to LCD moving artefacts such as motion blur. LCD motion blur has been measured objectively and with psycho-physics experiments. A motion-blur metric based on the temporal characteristics of LCD can be defined. A prediction model have been then designed which predict the differences of perceived quality between CRT and LCD. This motion-blur-based model enables the estimation of perceived quality on LCD with respect to the perceived quality on CRT. Technical solutions to LCD motion blur can thus be evaluated on natural contents by this mean.
ER -
English
